Oral Function Evaluation via Voice Prosody Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for evaluating oral function, such as those requiring appliances or visual inspections, can be uncomfortable and may overlook deterioration in elderly individuals, leading to undernutrition and increased risk of aspiration pneumonia due to inadequate assessment.

Innovation Solution

An oral function evaluation method that involves obtaining voice data from an individual uttering specific syllables or phrases, extracting prosody features, and calculating an estimated oral function value using an oral function estimating equation to assess deterioration state.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If an appliance is put on the neck to evaluate oral function, then evaluation accuracy is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to discomfort and burden on the evaluatee

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical appliance worn on the neck with an acoustic evaluation system that uses voice analysis. Instead of mechanical sensors contacting the body, the system captures voice signals and extracts prosody features to assess oral function, thereby eliminating the discomfort and burden of wearing an appliance while maintaining evaluation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces voice as an intermediary medium to indirectly assess oral function. Rather than directly measuring oral parameters with contact-based appliances, the system uses voice characteristics (prosody features) as a mediator that reflects oral function state, enabling non-contact evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If visual inspection or interview is used to evaluate oral function, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates leading to overlooked deterioration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidevaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective visual inspection and interview methods with an objective acoustic analysis system. Instead of relying on specialist observation and patient reporting, the system automatically extracts and analyzes prosody features from voice data, providing quantifiable and consistent measurements that reduce the risk of overlooking deterioration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements an automated feedback mechanism where the evaluation system continuously analyzes voice characteristics and provides objective assessment results. This feedback loop enables consistent monitoring of oral function changes over time, reducing reliance on intermittent specialist assessments and helping detect deterioration that might be missed during casual observation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240268705A1Oral function evaluation method, recording medium, oral function evaluation device, and oral function evaluation system
Publication Date: 2024.08.15 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US20240268705A1 patent drawing
  • US20240268705A1 patent drawing
  • US20240268705A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An oral function evaluation method includes: obtaining voice data obtained by collecting a voice of an evaluatee uttering a syllable or a fixed phrase that includes (i) two or more morae including a change in a first formant frequency or a change in a second formant frequency or (ii) at least one of a flap, a plosive, a voiceless sound, a double consonant, or a fricative; extracting a prosody feature from the voice data obtained; calculating an estimated value of an oral function of the evaluatee, based on the prosody feature extracted and an oral function estimating equation calculated based on a plurality of training data items; and evaluating an oral function deterioration state of the evaluatee by assessing the estimated value using an oral function evaluation indicator.