Oral Reading Error Classification System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current reading applications fail to accurately identify and handle oral reading errors such as hesitations, word omissions, and insertions, leading to inaccurate student assessment and suboptimal learning feedback, which reduces learning outcomes and makes remote learning tools less effective.

Innovation Solution

A system that captures oral reading attempts, converts them into text, and provides detailed error analysis, including classifications of insertions, omissions, and substitutions, to offer precise feedback and improve student understanding of reading errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing systems calculate accuracy rate without detailed error analysis, then the system is simple to operate, but the measurement precision of reading assessment is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereading assessment accuracyVSAvoiderror analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments reading errors into distinct categories (hesitations, omissions, insertions, substitutions) and analyzes each type separately using dedicated algorithms. This segmentation enables precise measurement of different error types while maintaining system organization through modular error detection components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary error analysis layer between audio input and final assessment. Speech-to-text conversion serves as an intermediary step that transforms audio data into text that can be systematically analyzed for various error types, enabling detailed measurement without directly complexifying the assessment system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the system provides comprehensive error classification feedback, then learning outcomes improve, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning effectivenessVSAvoidfeedback system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multi-level feedback mechanisms that provide students with specific error type information (hesitations, omissions, insertions, substitutions) along with correctness feedback. This detailed feedback enables students to understand and correct specific reading errors, improving learning effectiveness while the modular feedback structure manages system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by providing different types of feedback for different error categories. Each error type receives tailored feedback (e.g., specific guidance for hesitations versus substitutions), allowing the system to address specific learning needs without requiring a completely complexified feedback structure for all scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If the system handles oral reading errors with resubmission requests, then measurement precision is maintained, but loss of time occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy rate measurementVSAvoidreading practice time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables students to self-correct reading errors by providing them with specific error type information and guidance. Instead of requiring resubmission for feedback, students can immediately understand their errors (hesitations, omissions, insertions, substitutions) and attempt corrections, reducing time loss while maintaining measurement precision through continuous assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20230282130A1Reading level determination and feedback
Publication Date: 2023.09.07 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE AS REPRESENTED BY THE SEC OF THE ARMY
  • US20230282130A1 patent drawing
  • US20230282130A1 patent drawing
  • US20230282130A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The technology described herein helps a student learn how to read by determining a present reading level for the student and dynamically providing feedback that accurately identifies the specific oral reading errors made. The failure to identify oral reading mistakes, such as hesitations (‘uh-uh . . . pony’), word omissions, word or syllable insertions and other errors, results in inaccurate student assessment and proficiency scoring, as well as suboptimal learning feedback being provided back to the student. Allowing a student to understand the type of errors made helps the student avoid the same errors in subsequent efforts and helps the student understand what correct reading is. The system receives an oral reading attempt, identifies errors, classifies, the errors, and provides a proficiency score for the oral reading attempt. A report detailing the errors may also be generated.