Orbit-Aware Routing for Satellite Data Forwarding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Satellites in orbit face challenges in data routing due to dynamic environments and reliance on ground systems for route management, leading to inefficiencies and communication disruptions, especially near poles where cross-plane communication is hindered by radio frequency interference and cutoff latitudes.

Innovation Solution

Implementing orbit-aware routing techniques that allow satellites to autonomously determine and manage data routing without ground system reliance, using in-plane and cross-plane neighboring satellites to route data based on orbital planes and communication availability, thereby minimizing reliance on ground stations and adapting to changing link conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If satellites rely on ground systems for route generation, then routing management can be centralized, but routing responsiveness to dynamic link changes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting managementVSAvoidrouting responsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Satellites perform autonomous orbit-aware routing decisions independently without requiring ground system intervention. Each satellite evaluates its own orbital position, determines cross-plane communication feasibility, and selects next-hop neighbors autonomously based on real-time link conditions and destination requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The routing system dynamically adapts to changing orbital positions and link conditions. Satellites continuously update their routing decisions based on real-time factors including orbital plane changes, cross-plane communication availability, link outages, and destination location, ensuring optimal routing in a dynamic space environment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If satellites use cross-plane communication near poles, then global coverage is improved, but communication reliability deteriorates due to radio frequency interference and cutoff latitudes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglobal coverageVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The routing system applies location-specific routing logic based on orbital position. Satellites near polar regions with cutoff latitudes are routed through equatorial or mid-latitude satellites that maintain reliable cross-plane communication capabilities, while satellites in equatorial regions can directly perform cross-plane routing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Equatorial or mid-latitude satellites serve as intermediary nodes for polar satellite communications. When a polar satellite cannot directly communicate across orbital planes due to cutoff latitude constraints, data is routed through intermediate satellites in lower latitudes that maintain reliable cross-plane links

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If satellites autonomously determine routing without ground systems, then routing responsiveness improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting responsivenessVSAvoidrouting management overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous routing function is segmented into discrete, manageable steps: determining destination orbital plane, evaluating cross-plane communication feasibility with neighboring satellites, selecting appropriate next-hop satellite, and forwarding data. This segmentation reduces computational complexity while maintaining routing autonomy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Satellites perform only the minimum necessary routing evaluations required for autonomous operation. Instead of computing all possible routing paths, satellites evaluate only cross-plane communication feasibility with immediate neighbors and select the most direct route to the destination plane, reducing computational overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240089824A1Orbit-aware routing
Publication Date: 2024.03.14 SRI INTERNATIONAL
  • US20240089824A1 patent drawing
  • US20240089824A1 patent drawing
  • US20240089824A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A satellite orbiting the Earth may perform orbit-aware routing by receiving a data packet, determining whether a final destination plane of the data packet is different from an orbital plane of the satellite, in response to determining that the final destination plane of the data packet is different from the orbital plane of the satellite, determining whether the satellite is able to communicate with one or more cross-plane neighboring satellites, selecting a neighboring satellite to receive the data packet based at least in part on whether the satellite is able to communicate with one or more cross-plane neighboring satellites, and forwarding the data packet to the neighboring satellite.