Satellite Constellation Orbital Plane Adjustment for Safe Deorbiting
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The challenge of preventing collisions between satellites during the deorbiting process in satellite mega-constellations, where the deorbiting satellite's orbital plane and position are unpredictable, leading to frequent collision alerts and difficulty in taking avoidance actions.
Innovation Solution
A method involving a first satellite constellation at a higher altitude and a second satellite constellation at a lower altitude, where the second constellation adjusts its orbital planes to create a free orbit area for the deorbiting satellite to pass through, while a succeeding satellite is injected into the original orbit.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of manufacture
If a deorbiting satellite drops from a high-altitude orbit without control, then the deorbiting process is simple, but the satellite may collide with satellites in lower orbital planes
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary actions by detecting when a deorbiting satellite enters the orbital altitude zone of the mega-constellation and proactively forming a free orbit area before the satellite arrives. This advance preparation ensures collision avoidance is already in place before the deorbiting satellite becomes a hazard, resolving the contradiction between simple deorbiting and collision safety.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism - the free orbit area formed by temporarily adjusting orbital planes of the second satellite constellation - that mediates between the deorbiting satellite and the operational satellites. This intermediary space allows the deorbiting satellite to pass through safely without direct interaction or collision risk with operational satellites.
2Reliability
If multiple satellite constellations operate at different orbital altitudes, then collision risk is reduced, but the system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies dynamics by making the orbital plane configuration adjustable rather than fixed. The relative angles between orbital planes are dynamically changed to form free orbit areas only when needed for deorbiting satellites, then restored to normal operational configurations. This dynamic adjustment reduces overall system complexity while maintaining collision avoidance reliability.
Solution Approach 2:
The system changes orbital parameters (specifically the relative angles between orbital planes) temporarily to create free orbit areas. By modifying these parameters only when deorbiting satellites are present and returning them to normal values afterward, the system maintains reliability for collision avoidance while minimizing the complexity burden of managing multiple orbital configurations.
3Productivity
If satellites uniformly fly in multiple orbital planes, then the mega-constellation operates efficiently, but predicting collision danger becomes difficult when deorbiting occurs
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the orbital space by creating a dedicated free orbit area within the orbital altitude zone, separating the deorbiting satellite's path from the operational satellites' paths. This segmentation maintains the uniform orbital plane structure for efficient mega-constellation operation while making collision danger predictable by confining deorbiting activity to a specific, controlled segment of space.
Data Source
AI summary
When a deorbiting satellite, which is one of artificial satellites belonging to a first satellite constellation, deorbits and drops from an orbit of a first orbital altitude zone, a second satellite constellation widens a relative angle of any adjacent two orbital planes of a plurality of orbital planes and thereby allocates a free orbit area in a second orbital altitude zone. The deorbiting satellite passes through the free orbit area of the second orbital altitude zone.


