Order Processing Delay Prediction and Authorization Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Delayed payment capture in business models can result in orders being fulfilled outside their authorization periods, leading to revenue loss for enterprises due to unblocked customer funds being used for other purposes, especially when delays occur in manufacturing, testing, and repair processes.

Innovation Solution

An information processing system utilizing machine learning models to predict delay times for orders and initiate actions such as swapping products with lower priority orders or extending authorization periods to ensure timely fulfillment within the designated period.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of moving object

If delayed payment capture is used to allow more time for order fulfillment, then the authorization period is extended, but orders may be fulfilled outside the authorization period resulting in revenue loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthorization periodVSAvoidorder fulfillment within authorization period
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting delays using machine learning models before the authorization period expires. When a delay is predicted, the system proactively extends the authorization period or swaps products with lower priority orders before the original deadline, ensuring fulfillment occurs within a valid authorization window and preventing revenue loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The authorization period is made dynamic rather than fixed. The system continuously monitors predicted delay times and adjusts the authorization period duration based on real-time conditions. If delays are anticipated, the authorization period is extended; if delays are reduced, the period is maintained at original lengths, allowing flexible adaptation to changing fulfillment conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of time

If product swapping with lower priority orders is initiated to reduce delay time, then fulfillment timing is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelay timeVSAvoidorder management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The order management system performs product swapping autonomously without requiring manual intervention. The machine learning models automatically identify which orders are at risk of delay, determine appropriate swap candidates from lower priority orders, and execute the swapping process automatically, reducing the perceived complexity for users while maintaining sophisticated backend operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where machine learning models predict delay times, trigger swap actions when thresholds are exceeded, and then re-evaluate the impact of those swaps. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from past swapping decisions and optimize future actions, managing complexity through iterative improvement rather than static complex rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12182818B2Order processing based on predicted delay time to increase likelihood of order fulfillment within an authorization period
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 DELL PROD LP
  • US12182818B2 patent drawing
  • US12182818B2 patent drawing
  • US12182818B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus comprises a processing device configured to identify a given order for products to be manufactured by an entity, the given order being associated with an authorization period specifying a time in which the given order is to be fulfilled by the entity to initiate capture of blocked funds of a customer that placed the given order. The processing device is also configured, responsive to determining that the given order has at least a threshold likelihood of being delayed utilizing a first machine learning model, to predict a delay time of the given order utilizing a second machine learning model. The processing device is further configured, responsive to determining that the predicted delay time of the given order will result in the given order being fulfilled outside of its associated authorization period, to initiate action to reduce the predicted delay time or extend the authorization period.