Warehouse Order Packing Dynamic Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current warehouse and inventory management systems face inefficiencies in order fulfillment due to the lack of intelligence regarding orders at consolidation locations, leading to suboptimal packing processes and delays, as only order priority is considered without accounting for the number of items available or distance to consolidation locations.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic system that receives information about item priorities and locations, calculates a priority score based on distance, order priority, and available items, and directs consolidation processors to the most efficient consolidation locations for processing, ensuring timely and efficient order completion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If consolidation processors freely travel from one consolidation location to another based only on order priority, then order fulfillment can be performed, but operational efficiency is reduced due to lack of intelligence regarding orders and items at consolidation locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment efficiencyVSAvoidintelligence regarding orders at consolidation locations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously collects and processes information about items at consolidation locations, including item priority, customer information, number of items available, and processor location. This feedback loop enables dynamic calculation of priority scores that reflect current warehouse conditions, allowing consolidation processors to make intelligent routing decisions based on real-time data about order status and item availability at each consolidation location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary intelligence layer between the consolidation locations and processors. This intermediary calculates priority scores by synthesizing multiple parameters (distance, number of items, order priority) and translates complex warehouse state information into actionable routing instructions, enabling processors to operate efficiently without needing to directly assess all consolidation location conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If only order priority is used to direct consolidation processors, then routing decisions can be made, but packing process is impaired due to lack of intelligence regarding items at consolidation location

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting decision simplicityVSAvoidintelligence regarding items at consolidation location
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback collection about items at consolidation locations, including item priority levels, customer information, and inventory status. This feedback enables the system to maintain simple routing decisions based on priority scores while simultaneously incorporating detailed item-level intelligence that improves packing process efficiency and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms multiple parameters (distance, number of items available, order priority) into a single composite priority score parameter. This parameter transformation maintains the simplicity of routing decisions while incorporating comprehensive item-level intelligence, as the priority score encapsulates all relevant information about consolidation location status and item characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If consolidation processors travel to consolidation locations without intelligence about available items, then processors can perform packing, but time is lost due to suboptimal routing and processing sequences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for packing processVSAvoidinformation about number of items and order status
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously collecting and analyzing information about items at consolidation locations before consolidation processors arrive. Priority scores are calculated in advance based on distance, number of items available, and order priority, enabling processors to be routed to the most efficient consolidation locations first, thereby reducing waiting time and optimizing the packing process sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic routing that adapts to changing warehouse conditions. As items are consolidated and order status changes, the priority scores are recalculated in real-time, allowing consolidation processors to dynamically adjust their routing and always work on the highest priority tasks available, minimizing idle time and optimizing overall packing process duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11270371B2System and method for order packing
Publication Date: 2022.03.08 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US11270371B2 patent drawing
  • US11270371B2 patent drawing
  • US11270371B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer-readable storage media for improved warehouse operations are provided. A consolidation processor (manual or automatic) establishes a connection to a warehouse management system. The current collection location of the consolidation processor may maybe established either manually or by automatically transmitting their current physical location in a facility to the warehouse management system. The warehouse management system may then direct the consolidation processor to a consolidation location to package orders for shipment. This direction may be given based on one or more parameters.