Order Routing and Redirection for Fulfillment Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current online ordering systems in the food service industry are inefficient, as customers lack optimal selection options for timely delivery or pickup, often encountering issues with menu item availability and order delays due to traffic and personnel availability, requiring manual and time-consuming research and changes.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for order routing and redirection that uses real-time data to identify and select the optimal establishment for order fulfillment based on location, preparation times, and traffic conditions, allowing for automatic selection and redirection if necessary, integrating with existing online ordering services and aggregator platforms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If customers manually check order processing times and traffic conditions at multiple sites to select an optimal ordering site, then they can make an informed selection, but this process is time-consuming and inconvenient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder selection accuracyVSAvoidcustomer time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic order routing and redirection without requiring customer action. The processor autonomously monitors order status, identifies delays, selects alternative establishments, and redirects orders, eliminating the need for customers to manually research and change orders while maintaining optimal fulfillment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors real-time data including order status, preparation times, and fulfillment progress from multiple establishments. This feedback loop enables dynamic decision-making to redirect orders when delays are detected, improving selection accuracy without customer time investment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If customers periodically check order progress and manually initiate changes when needed, then they can respond to delays, but this requires manual identification of alternative sites, cancellation, and re-ordering which is inconvenient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment reliabilityVSAvoidorder change convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system autonomously monitors order fulfillment progress and automatically redirects orders when delays are detected. The processor identifies alternative establishments, executes cancellation at the original site, and places new orders without customer intervention, maintaining reliability while dramatically improving ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-identifies alternative establishments that can fulfill the same order requirements. When delays occur, these pre-identified alternatives enable immediate redirection without requiring customers to search for new options, ensuring reliable fulfillment while simplifying the process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If customers select a site based on proximity or past history, then the selection process is simple, but they cannot know if another site can provide faster service or have better menu item availability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesite selection simplicityVSAvoidorder optimization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously gathers real-time feedback from multiple establishments including current preparation times, menu item availability, and fulfillment status. This data feeds into the routing algorithm to dynamically select the optimal establishment, maintaining simple customer interaction while dramatically improving order optimization accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system evaluates multiple establishments simultaneously against multiple criteria (preparation time, availability, proximity) and can redirect to any suitable alternative. This multi-functional approach ensures optimal order fulfillment while keeping the customer interface simple and unchanged

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20220164858A1Order Routing and Redirecting for Fulfillment Processing
Publication Date: 2022.05.26 NCR VOYIX CORP
  • US20220164858A1 patent drawing
  • US20220164858A1 patent drawing
  • US20220164858A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Order details for an order is evaluated based on real-time data associated with establishments that can satisfy the order, location data, traffic conditions, estimated order preparation times, and available delivery personnel (when the order is associated with a delivery). An optimal establishment that can fulfill the order is selected and the order with the order details is placed with the optimal establishment. In an embodiment, the real-time data continues to be evaluated after the order is placed, and when conditions warrant the order is redirected to a new optimal establishment for fulfillment.