3D Printed Ore Separation Wheel with Micro Grooves

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ore separation systems with round bodies and rigid or square riffle designs fail to efficiently separate ores with negative draft angles, leading to inefficiencies and durability issues in commercial mining settings.

Innovation Solution

A 3D printing method is employed to create a circular ore separation wheel with teeth and valleys, featuring negative draft angles less than 90 degrees, micro grooves, and varying dimensions, allowing for efficient separation of ores with specific gravity of 10.0 or higher.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional manufacturing methods are used to make ore separation wheels, then production time and cost are reduced, but the ability to create negative draft angles less than 90 degrees is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenegative draft angle precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the manufacturing method from traditional subtractive or form-based processes to additive manufacturing (3D printing), enabling the creation of complex geometries including negative draft angles less than 90 degrees that were previously impossible to manufacture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs curved and complex geometries in the riffle design, specifically implementing negative draft angles and organic shapes that cannot be achieved with traditional flat-pattern manufacturing methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Productivity

If rigid or square riffle designs are used, then manufacturing is simpler, but separation efficiency for ores with specific gravity 10.0 or higher deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveore separation efficiencyVSAvoidriffle design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different geometries to different parts of the riffle structure, with varying angles and profiles optimized for specific separation functions, rather than using uniform rigid designs throughout

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The riffle design incorporates dynamic flow paths and varying angles that adapt to the movement of ore particles during separation, rather than static rigid structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Strength

If conventional 3D printing parameters are used, then printing speed is maintained, but the durability and mechanical strength of the ore separation wheel deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel durabilityVSAvoidprinting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes 3D printing parameters including layer height, infill density, and print orientation to achieve the required mechanical strength and durability while maintaining reasonable production time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses materials with enhanced mechanical properties suitable for industrial applications, potentially incorporating composite materials or optimized polymer formulations that provide both strength and wear resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS10532380B2Making an ore separation wheel
Publication Date: 2020.01.14 MARTORI JOSEPH J
  • US10532380B2 patent drawing
  • US10532380B2 patent drawing
  • US10532380B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of making a circular ore separation wheel, for concentration critical stategic rare earths, and preciouse metals, such as gold. The method comprising: 1) forming a base section of the circular ore separation wheel using 3D printing; 2) forming a central hole in the base section being centrally located in the circular ore separation wheel; 3) forming a plurality of teeth, using 3D printing, upon the base section, having a inner end proximate to the central hole and extending therefrom in a circularly radiating direction and having an outer end opposite the inner end with different sizes on the same length of tooth, 4) forming a plurality of micro grooves from about 4.5-0.001 mm partially along outer surfaces of the plurality of teeth extending in a direction from the inner end to the outer end of the plurality of teeth, wherein the plurality of micro grooves are formed by the 3D printing process leaving a small gap located between subsequent extruded layers at the outer surface of the plurality of teeth; and 5) forming a circumferential wall around the ore separation wheel that is proximate to the outer end of the plurality of teeth, and is proximate to the base section. And potentially manufacturing the circular ore separation wheel inside of a pre-made support section with the desired internal concave contours.