Organ Detection Using Adaboost Classification Algorithms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional medical imaging systems struggle to automatically differentiate between various organs in the human body due to anatomical feature similarities, leading to inaccurate scanning results and the need for multiple specialized systems, which are inflexible and costly.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus using machine learning algorithms, such as Adaboost, to identify and represent organs by choosing predefined features and weak learners, developing a strong classifier, and applying it to medical scan data sets to produce accurate visual representations in both two and three dimensions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional imaging systems are used to scan organs, then scanning can be performed, but the systems cannot automatically differentiate between different organs due to anatomical feature similarities, leading to significant error in scanning results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorgan differentiation accuracyVSAvoidscanning result accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the organ identification process into multiple analysis stages: initial scan data acquisition, feature extraction from anatomical structures, classification algorithm application, and result verification. This multi-stage segmentation allows each stage to focus on specific differentiation tasks, improving overall organ identification accuracy by breaking down the complex differentiation problem into manageable components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces classification algorithms as an intermediary between raw scan data and final organ identification. These algorithms act as mediators that process the scan data, apply learned patterns from training datasets, and produce differentiated organ identifications. This intermediary processing layer enables accurate differentiation of organs with similar anatomical features by applying computational intelligence rather than relying solely on conventional imaging thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple specialized systems are used to scan different organs, then detailed scanning of specific organs can be achieved, but the systems become expensive to manufacture and require specialized training for each individual operating the system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorgan scanning detailVSAvoidnumber of specialized systems
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal scanning system that can identify multiple different organ types using a single integrated platform. The system employs a common hardware infrastructure combined with software-based classification algorithms that can be configured to identify various organs including heart vessels, liver vasculature, and femoral arteries. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for multiple specialized systems while maintaining detailed scanning capability across different organ types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes in the classification algorithms to adapt the single system to different organ identification tasks. By modifying algorithm parameters, training datasets, and feature extraction parameters rather than changing physical hardware, the system can switch between identifying different organ types. This parameter-based adaptability allows one system to perform the functions previously requiring multiple specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If conventional systems are designed for individual organs to limit error, then scanning accuracy for that specific organ improves, but the systems lack the capability to be programmed for new tasks and cannot be updated with latest scanning technologies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning accuracyVSAvoidprogrammability for new tasks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic system where the classification algorithms can be continuously updated and retrained with new data. The system transitions from static, hardwired organ identification to a dynamic architecture where algorithm parameters, decision thresholds, and training datasets can be modified to incorporate latest scanning technologies and address new identification tasks. This dynamic nature allows the system to maintain high reliability for established organs while adapting to new organ types and scanning methodologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the system to self-update through automated retraining processes where the classification algorithms can be retrained on new datasets without requiring complete system redesign. The system incorporates mechanisms to learn from new scanning data, automatically adjust parameters, and improve performance over time. This self-service capability allows continuous improvement of scanning accuracy and adaptation to new tasks without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7894653B2Automatic organ detection using machine learning and classification algorithms
Publication Date: 2011.02.22 SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA INC
  • US7894653B2 patent drawing
  • US7894653B2 patent drawing
  • US7894653B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus of visually depicting an organ, having the steps of choosing a predefined set features for analysis, the predefined set of features having distinguishing weak learners for an algorithm, wherein the predefined set of features and the weak learners chosen distinguish features of the organ desired to be represented, developing a strong classifier for the algorithm for the organ desired to be represented based upon the weak learners for the organ, one of conducing a body scan to produce a body scan data set and obtaining a body scan data set of information for a patient, applying the strong classifier and the algorithm to the body scan data set to develop a result of a representation of the organ and outputting the result of the step of applying of the strong classifier and the algorithm to the body scan data set to represent the organ.