Organ and Tumor Segmentation via Evolution Equations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Segmentation of primary and metastatic tumors, as well as heterogeneous organs like the liver, spleen, and kidney in cross-sectional images is challenging due to their complex structures, requiring accurate and efficient delineation and volume measurement for effective therapy response assessment and non-invasive diagnosis.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the determination of initial boundary positions using image data, with the evaluation of evolution equations that consider topographical distances and statistical metrics to refine and accurately segment organs and tumors, employing active contour models and topographical effects to handle complex boundaries and heterogeneous properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional segmentation methods are used on heterogeneous organs and tumors, then the segmentation process is simpler, but the segmentation accuracy deteriorates due to complex structures and heterogeneous properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation accuracyVSAvoidsegmentation method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the image processing into distinct stages: initial boundary detection, evolution equation evaluation, and boundary refinement. Multiple boundaries are processed separately and then integrated, allowing complex heterogeneous structures to be handled through systematic division of the segmentation task into manageable components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic evolution equations that allow boundaries to adapt and evolve iteratively based on image data and topographical distances. The boundaries are not static but dynamically adjusted through multiple evaluations of evolution equations, enabling the segmentation to adapt to heterogeneous properties within organs and tumors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If accurate delineation of complex anatomical structures is pursued, then diagnosis quality improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelineation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary boundary detection and initial positioning before final refinement. Evolution equations are evaluated in advance with initial boundary data, and topographical distances are pre-calculated, allowing the final segmentation to be achieved more efficiently without sacrificing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous refinement of boundaries through iterative evaluation of evolution equations. Rather than discrete, repeated processing steps, the method continuously adjusts boundaries based on accumulating information from image data and topographical analysis, improving efficiency while maintaining high delineation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS10388020B2Methods and systems for segmentation of organs and tumors and objects
Publication Date: 2019.08.20 THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIV IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • US10388020B2 patent drawing
  • US10388020B2 patent drawing
  • US10388020B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for segmentation of organs and tumors and cells in image data include revising a position of a boundary by evaluating an evolution equation that includes differences of amplitude values for voxels on the boundary from a statistical metric of amplitude of voxels inside, and from a statistical metric of amplitude of voxels outside, for a limited region that lies within a distance r of the boundary. The distance r is small compared to a perimeter of the first boundary. Some techniques include determining a revised position of multiple boundaries by evaluating an evolution equation that includes differences in a first topographical distance from a first marker and a second topographical distance from a second marker for each voxel on the boundary, and also includes at least one other term related to boundary detection.