Organic Electron Injection Layer for OLED Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) face inefficiencies in electron injection due to large interface barriers, leading to energy loss and potential device failure, and the use of metallic dopants can cause degradation and stability issues.

Innovation Solution

An organic electron injection layer composed of 4,7-di phenyl-1,10 phenanthroline (BPhen) doped with Tetracyano quino dimethane (TCNQ) is used to improve electron injection efficiency, eliminating the need for metallic dopants and reducing the risk of degradation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If metallic dopants are used to improve electron injection, then electron injection efficiency is improved, but device stability and longevity deteriorate due to degradation and reactivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectron injection efficiencyVSAvoiddevice stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces stable but ineffective metallic dopants with organic materials that can be easily deposited and removed. The organic electron injection layer uses materials like BPhen and Alq3 that are stable, non-reactive with electrodes, and can be deposited via simple vacuum evaporation without requiring reactive metallic dopants that degrade over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite organic materials consisting of electron transport materials (BPhen, Alq3) combined with alkali metal complexes (Li, Na, K) in specific ratios. This composite approach creates an electron injection layer that achieves high electron injection efficiency through synergistic effects while maintaining stability, as the organic matrix protects the reactive alkali metal components from degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Loss of energy

If large potential drop across charge injection layers is reduced to improve efficiency, then energy loss is reduced, but the complexity of optimizing layer composition and thickness increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy lossVSAvoidlayer composition optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically optimizes key parameters including the thickness of the electron injection layer (ranging from 5-20 nm), the doping concentration of alkali metals (0.1-5% atomic ratio), and the composition ratios of organic materials. By carefully controlling these parameters, the patent achieves minimal potential drop across the injection layer, reducing energy loss while maintaining manufacturability through established vacuum deposition techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If reactive low work function metals are used to improve electron injection, then electron injection efficiency is improved, but device reliability deteriorates due to reactivity with water and oxygen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectron injection efficiencyVSAvoiddevice stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces stable but ineffective metallic dopants with organic materials that can be easily deposited and removed. The organic electron injection layer uses materials like BPhen and Alq3 that are stable, non-reactive with electrodes, and can be deposited via simple vacuum evaporation without requiring reactive metallic dopants that degrade over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an organic intermediary layer (BPhen, Alq3) between the cathode and the electron transport layer. This intermediary layer has appropriate energy levels to facilitate electron injection while being chemically stable and non-reactive with water and oxygen, thus protecting the device from degradation while maintaining high electron injection efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves efficient electron injection with a stable and uniform organic electron injection layer, reducing energy loss and enhancing the longevity of OLEDs, suitable for both display and lighting applications.

Implementation Method 1

Balanced injection and transport of charge carriers from both the electrodes i.e. cathode as well as anode side is crucial for highly efficient OLEDs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCharge transport: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS8491820B2Process for growing an electron injection layer to improve the efficiency of organic light emitting diodes
Publication Date: 2013.07.23 COUNCIL OF SCI & IND RES
  • US8491820B2 patent drawing
  • US8491820B2 patent drawing
  • US8491820B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An organic light emitting functional device with organic electron injection layer to improve the injection of electrons from the cathode in an organic light emitting diode. In particular, the device relates to the use of electron transport layer 4,7-di phenyl-1,10 phenanthroline (herein after called as BPhen) and another organic semiconductor Tetracyano quino dimethane (herein after called as TCNQ) and optimizing the thickness and doping percentage of the composition in an organic light emitting device. The main use of the composed injection layer is to balance the injection of holes from the anode side and the injection of electrons from cathode side and thus increase the efficiency of Organic light emitting diodes.