Organic material grinder

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing organic material grinders are inefficient in reducing particle size due to materials being redirected away from cutting edges, leading to incomplete processing.

Innovation Solution

A grinder design featuring rotating blades with guide surfaces that redirect organic material towards fixed blades for repeated cutting, utilizing a housing assembly with a gauge screen and interchangeable screens to control particle size, and a bidirectional cutting mechanism for efficient size reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If organic material is processed in conventional grinders without guide surfaces, then the structure is simple, but the cutting efficiency is poor because material is redirected away from cutting edges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting efficiencyVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fixed blade is segmented into multiple functional zones: an upper guide surface portion and a lower cutting edge portion. This segmentation allows the blade to perform both guiding and cutting functions simultaneously, improving cutting efficiency without requiring entirely separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fixed blade serves multiple functions: it guides the organic material downward via its guide surface and simultaneously performs cutting via its cutting edge. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by improving productivity while avoiding additional structural complexity that would result from separate guiding and cutting components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional grinding mechanisms are used, then the device is simple to operate, but the particle size reduction is inconsistent and incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size consistencyVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The guide surface performs preliminary action by directing material onto the cutting edge at the optimal position and angle before cutting occurs. This preliminary guidance ensures that material is consistently positioned for cutting, improving particle size consistency without requiring complex operational adjustments by the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The guide surface automatically directs material onto the cutting edge without requiring user intervention. The system self-regulates material flow and positioning, achieving consistent particle size reduction while maintaining ease of operation as the user simply needs to load material into the chamber.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If single-direction cutting is used, then the mechanism is simple, but the processing capacity is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rotating blade is designed with asymmetric features: different numbers of rotating and fixed blades, and bidirectional cutting edges on the rotating blade. This asymmetric design enables efficient bidirectional cutting, doubling processing capacity while avoiding the complexity of two separate single-direction mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static single-direction cutting to dynamic bidirectional cutting. The rotating blade can efficiently cut material in both clockwise and counter-clockwise rotation directions, adapting to different operational needs and increasing overall processing capacity without requiring two separate mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design ensures efficient cutting and size reduction of organic materials by repeatedly redirecting material to cutting edges, achieving consistent particle size reduction and allowing for adjustable output through interchangeable screens.

Implementation Method 1

rotating blades which rotate past fixed blades in a shearing action

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 2

a guide surface above the cutting edge of the fixed blade which extends downwardly towards the cutting edge of the fixed blade to guide organic material downwardly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS10617258B2Organic material grinder
Publication Date: 2020.04.14 ELEVATOR INNOVATIONS INC
  • US10617258B2 patent drawing
  • US10617258B2 patent drawing
  • US10617258B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A grinder for reducing particle size of an organic matter, for example herbs, includes a housing assembly supporting a gauge screen therein to define a cutting chamber thereabove and a receiving chamber therebelow. A plurality of fixed blades are mounted in the cutting chamber in fixed relation to the housing assembly and a plurality of rotating blades rotate relative to the fixed blades to reduce size of the organic matter by cutting, shearing and/or grinding. The gauge screen is replaceable with other screens of different gauge independently of the fixed and rotating blades. The blades are bidirectional and include guide surfaces on the fixed blades which guide material downwardly and into the direction of rotation relative to respective cutting edges of the blades as the rotating blades are rotated relative to the fixed blades in either direction.