Organic Random Polymer Structure to Eliminate Isomers in NIR Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing organic optoelectronic devices face challenges with isomer formation during synthesis of non-fullerene acceptor polymers, leading to performance variability and high production costs, due to the use of 2-(3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-ylidene) malononitrile as the polymerization site, which complicates separation and purification.

Innovation Solution

The use of the 3-position of thiophene as the polymerization site for organic random polymers, eliminating isomer formation and simplifying synthesis, while allowing for tunable absorption wavelengths and improved thermal stability, enabling large-scale production with non-halogenated solvents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the 2-(3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-ylidene) malononitrile (IC) terminal group is used as the polymerization reaction position, then non-fullerene acceptor materials can be synthesized, but isomers are formed during modification which are difficult to separate, resulting in polymers containing different isomeric forms and performance variability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynthesis processVSAvoidisomer separation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the problematic IC terminal group from the polymerization site and replaces it with a furan ring structure. This extraction of the harmful element (IC group that causes isomer formation) eliminates the separation difficulty while maintaining the core functionality of the non-fullerene acceptor material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical structure parameter by introducing a furan ring at the polymerization position instead of the IC terminal group. This structural parameter change fundamentally alters the polymerization mechanism to prevent isomer formation, achieving both ease of manufacture and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If small molecules are used in organic semiconductor devices, then material synthesis is straightforward, but they are prone to crystallization when devices are heat treated causing defective devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial synthesisVSAvoiddevice stability under heat treatment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the advantages of both small molecules and polymers by creating a polymeric non-fullerene acceptor material. The polymer structure prevents crystallization and improves thermal stability while maintaining the ease of synthesis and processability characteristic of small molecule materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite polymeric structure that integrates the beneficial properties of different material classes. The polymer backbone provides thermal stability and prevents crystallization, while the incorporated non-fullerene acceptor units maintain good processability and synthesis feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If high molecular weight polymers are used, then thermal stability is improved and crystallinity is reduced, but synthesis and purification become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal stabilityVSAvoidsynthesis and purification process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing specific functional groups (furan rings) at critical positions in the polymer chain. This localized structural modification enables controlled polymerization that produces high molecular weight polymers with uniform structures, simplifying purification while maintaining thermal stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If halogenated solvents are used for polymer processing, then solubility and processability are improved, but environmental friendliness and safety are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprocessabilityVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the solvent parameter from halogenated to non-halogenated types. This is achieved by modifying the polymer structure (using furan rings instead of IC groups) to improve compatibility with environmentally friendly solvents, maintaining processability while eliminating harmful environmental effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250366360A1Organic random polymer and organic optoelectronic device using the same
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 RAYNERGY TEK INC
  • US20250366360A1 patent drawing
  • US20250366360A1 patent drawing
  • US20250366360A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An organic random polymer comprises a structure of Formula I:The organic random polymer utilizes the 3-position of a sulfur-containing five-membered heterocycle as the polymerization site rather than the end of 2-(3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-ylidene) malononitrile, and thus there are no isomers. The organic random polymer can be tailored by adjusting the y-block to absorb light in the shortwave infrared region and exhibit good thermal stability. The present invention also provides an organic optoelectronic device comprising a first electrode, an active layer, and a second electrode. The active layer contains the organic random polymer. This organic optoelectronic device demonstrates good external quantum efficiency in the near-infrared region and possesses excellent thermal stability.