Orientable Thrust Nozzle With Fluidic Injection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing nozzle technologies for aircraft, particularly those without vertical stabilizers, face challenges in efficiently steering aircraft in yaw without significant thrust losses or performance penalties, especially in reducing radar and infrared signatures for stealth applications.

Innovation Solution

A thrust-oriented nozzle design that splits the main flow into two half-nozzles, allowing separate control of each thrust vector through fluidic injection, with means for distributing flow and orienting thrust vectors in each half-nozzle, minimizing engine performance impact and reducing infrared signatures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If fluidic injection is used in the divergent part of the nozzle to deflect the thrust vector, then yaw steering capability is improved, but thrust losses occur due to shock wave crossing and engine bleed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyaw steering capabilityVSAvoidthrust losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The nozzle is divided into two separate half-nozzles, each capable of independent thrust vector control. This segmentation allows selective deflection of individual half-nozzle thrust vectors to produce yaw moments without requiring large deflections from a single nozzle, thereby reducing shock wave losses and improving overall thrust efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A fluidic injection system acts as an intermediary to control the thrust vector orientation. By injecting fluid at specific locations in the divergent portion of each half-nozzle, the thrust vector is deflected through aerodynamic interactions rather than mechanical moving parts, eliminating mechanical complexity while maintaining control authority.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If mechanical means are used to deflect the jet for thrust vectoring, then thrust orientation control is improved, but device complexity increases due to moving parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust orientation controlVSAvoidmechanical moving parts
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical deflection systems with a fluidic injection system. Instead of using moving mechanical parts to physically redirect the jet flow, fluid is injected into the divergent portion of the nozzle to create aerodynamic forces that deflect the thrust vector. This substitution eliminates mechanical moving parts while maintaining effective thrust orientation control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If fluidic injection is used near the nozzle throat to control cross section, then flow rate control is improved, but engine performance deteriorates due to reduced surge margin

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate controlVSAvoidcompressor surge margin
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fluidic injection system is positioned in the divergent portion of the nozzle rather than near the throat, allowing preliminary control of the flow characteristics before the flow reaches critical sections. This preliminary action enables effective thrust vector control without creating obstructions that would reduce compressor surge margin and maintain engine performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables effective yaw steering with reduced thrust losses and minimal impact on engine performance, while maintaining low radar and infrared signatures, enhancing stealth capabilities for aircraft.

Implementation Method 1

The deviation of the thrust vector is then produced by the deviation of the flow crossing the oblique shock wave induced by the obstruction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave: Shock Wave

Implementation Method 2

the overpressure generated by the separation of the boundary layer in the vicinity of the injection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBoundary layer separation: Boundary Layer

Data Source

PatentEP1741915B1Nozzle with orientable thrust
Publication Date: 2010.06.02 SN DETUDE & DE CONSTR DE MOTEURS DAVIATION (S N E C M A)
  • EP1741915B1 patent drawingFigure 1~4
  • EP1741915B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The nozzle (10) divides a principal flow coming from a channel into two symmetrical portions which end in two half nozzles (14,16) having rectangular cross sections. Each of the half nozzle consists of a rectangular throat having a horizontal elongation, and internal sides with walls longer than the divergent portion which is downstream of the throat. A fluid injector (18) is disposed on a wall at the level of the throat.