Orientation-Based Control Element Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote control devices lack efficient mechanisms to dynamically configure their functionality based on orientation relative to controlled devices, leading to potential misoperation and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A control device that uses a magnetometer to determine its orientation relative to a magnetic reference point, defining zones to enable or disable specific sets of control elements, and learns from user interactions to adjust these zones based on unexpected inputs, thereby adapting functionality accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the control device uses fixed zone boundaries for controlling functionality, then the device structure is simple, but the adaptability to different user orientations and usage scenarios is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to user orientationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device automatically learns and adapts to user orientation patterns through the magnetometer and processing unit without requiring manual configuration. The system observes unexpected inputs and autonomously modifies zone boundaries to match actual usage scenarios, making the device self-adjusting and highly adaptive while maintaining simple operation for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The zone boundaries are made dynamic and adjustable rather than fixed. The processing unit continuously monitors control element inputs and automatically modifies the magnetic zone boundaries based on learned user behavior patterns, allowing the device to adapt its functionality zones to different usage scenarios and orientations over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If all control elements remain enabled, then all functions are available, but battery consumption increases and unintended inputs occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereduction of unintended inputsVSAvoidbattery consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control device predicts which control elements will be needed based on the determined orientation and zone boundaries, enabling only those relevant control elements in advance. This preliminary configuration prevents unintended inputs from disabled elements and reduces battery consumption by keeping unnecessary elements inactive before they are actually needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Different control elements are selectively enabled or disabled based on their relevance to the current orientation and zone. Instead of uniformly enabling all elements, the system applies local quality control where only control elements within the active zone are enabled, reducing overall power consumption while maintaining reliability for relevant functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If the control device requires manual configuration of zones, then the initial setup is simple, but the device cannot adapt to changing usage scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to usage scenariosVSAvoidtime for configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control device performs automatic configuration through the learning process where the processing unit observes user interactions and autonomously determines optimal zone boundaries. This self-service approach eliminates the need for manual configuration time while enabling the device to adapt to changing usage scenarios automatically as usage patterns evolve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from control element inputs to continuously refine zone boundaries. When unexpected inputs are detected, the processing unit analyzes these feedback signals and adjusts the magnetic zone boundaries accordingly, allowing the device to learn and adapt to new usage scenarios without requiring user intervention or configuration time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If the magnetometer continuously monitors orientation, then the orientation accuracy is high, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorientation accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetometer performs periodic orientation measurements rather than continuous monitoring. The processing unit determines orientation at appropriate intervals and updates zone boundaries based on these periodic measurements, maintaining sufficient orientation accuracy for controlling functionality while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances the operational efficiency and user experience by ensuring that control elements are properly configured based on orientation, reducing unintended inputs and optimizing battery life by disabling unnecessary elements.

Implementation Method 1

determining an orientation of a control device with respect to a magnetic reference point with a magnetometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetometer: Magnetometer

Data Source

PatentEP2710810B1Configuring the functionality of control elements of a control device based on orientation
Publication Date: 2017.07.19 ECHOSTAR TECH LLC
  • EP2710810B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2710810B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2710810B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

A control device controls the functionality of two or more sets of control elements. A processing unit of the control device determines that it is oriented in a first zone or in a second zone based on input received from a magnetometer. The first and second zones are defined with respect to a magnetic reference point and are oriented relative to a controlled device or an electronic device. If the processing unit determines that the control device is oriented in the first zone, the processing unit configures a first functionality for the first set of control elements. If the control device's orientation changes from being oriented in the first zone to being oriented in the second zone, the processing unit configures the first set of control elements with a second functionality.