Orientation-Based Proximity Sensors With Adaptive Detection Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing portable electronic devices with proximity sensors face challenges in dynamically adjusting power consumption and detecting environmental conditions effectively, as they often require fixed settings and lack adaptive sensitivity to minimize noise interference and optimize functionality.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of self-calibrating proximity sensors that dynamically derive detection thresholds based on environmental conditions, allowing for context-driven operation modes and adaptive adjustments in range and sensitivity to minimize power consumption and enhance detection capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If proximity sensors use fixed detection thresholds, then device complexity is reduced, but detection precision deteriorates due to inability to adapt to varying environmental conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoidsensor complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The proximity sensor automatically performs self-calibration by deriving detection thresholds from background measurements taken in the current environment. The sensor serves itself by adjusting its own parameters without external intervention, thereby improving detection precision while avoiding the complexity of manual calibration systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The detection threshold parameter is dynamically changed based on environmental conditions. The sensor measures background signal levels and adjusts the threshold parameter accordingly, enabling adaptation to different environments (e.g., noisy vs. quiet areas) without requiring complex pre-programming or manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If proximity sensors operate continuously with high sensitivity, then detection capability is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor operates dynamically by continuously monitoring background conditions and adjusting its detection threshold in real-time. This dynamic operation allows the sensor to maintain high detection capability when needed while reducing power consumption by adapting to current environmental rather than operating at maximum sensitivity continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor uses feedback from background measurements to adjust its operating parameters. By continuously measuring the environmental baseline and comparing incoming signals against this adaptive threshold, the sensor maintains reliable detection while avoiding unnecessary high-power operation in stable environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If proximity sensors use adaptive detection thresholds based on environmental conditions, then detection precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional calibration mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoidsensor complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The proximity sensor performs self-calibration by automatically deriving detection thresholds from background measurements. This self-service approach eliminates the need for external calibration equipment or complex manual adjustment mechanisms, achieving adaptive precision without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration function is merged with the normal detection operation. The same sensor hardware and processing circuitry used for detecting proximity objects are also used for measuring background conditions and deriving thresholds, thereby achieving adaptive precision without adding separate calibration subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If proximity sensors dynamically adjust detection thresholds, then adaptability to environmental conditions is improved, but processing time increases due to continuous calibration requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental adaptabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor performs preliminary background measurements to establish detection thresholds before actual proximity detection begins. By pre-calibrating the detection parameters based on environmental conditions, the system achieves rapid adaptation without requiring time-consuming adjustments during active detection operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor performs background calibration periodically rather than continuously. This periodic action allows the system to adapt to environmental changes while minimizing processing time overhead, as full calibration is only performed when environmental conditions are likely to have changed rather than at every detection cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP2731271B1Portable electronic device having directional proximity sensors based on device orientation
Publication Date: 2017.04.12 GOOGLE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC
  • EP2731271B1 patent drawing
  • EP2731271B1 patent drawing
  • EP2731271B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A portable electronic device (201) having one or more proximity sensors (317) . The portable electronic device (201) comprises a housing (701), one or more signal emitters (703,705,709,711) to direct source signal(s) based on the orientation of the housing (701), and one or more signal receivers (707,713) to receive return signals corresponding to the source signal(s). For one embodiment, the device may include multiple signal emitters (703,705,709,711) and a sensor (319) to identify an orientation of the housing (701). The appropriate signal emitter (703,705,709,711) may be selected based on the orientation of the housing (701) as identified by the sensor (319). For another embodiment, the device may include a mechanism to redirect a source signal from a signal emitter (703,705,709,711) in an appropriate direction based on the orientation of the housing (701).