Origami Robot Structure for Switching Air, Ground, and Water Modes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robot technologies fail to seamlessly integrate wheeled, rotorcraft, and aquatic modes, leading to increased size, stability issues, and complex control algorithms, while lacking independent motion capabilities in each configuration.

Innovation Solution

A robot design based on origami principles with a single degree of freedom, utilizing linkage components, central panels, and sector-shaped panels, enabled by a folding/unfolding motor and motion control system, allowing complete switching between multirotor, wheel, and waterborne configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If passive wheels are added to a rotorcraft robot to combine motion functionalities, then the robot can perform both aerial flight and wheeled motion, but the robot size increases and flight stability is affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion functionalityVSAvoidrobot size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the rotorcraft and wheeled structures into a single integrated body where the rotor arms themselves serve as the wheeled structure. The four rotor arms can function as rotors for aerial flight or fold down to serve as wheels for ground motion, eliminating the need for separate passive wheel components and reducing overall robot volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rotor arms are designed with multi-functionality, serving dual purposes as both flight rotors and ground wheels. This universal design allows the same structural components to perform different functions depending on the operational mode, thereby reducing the total number of components and robot size while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple degrees of freedom are introduced to increase motion modes, then the robot can achieve more motion configurations, but the control algorithm complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion modesVSAvoidcontrol algorithm
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into three independent modules: configuration switching control, aerial flight control, and ground motion control. Each module handles specific tasks independently, simplifying the overall control algorithm. The configuration switching module manages the transition between modes, while the flight and ground control modules handle respective motion controls without interfering with each other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The robot employs dynamic configuration switching where the structure adapts its degrees of freedom based on the operational mode. In aerial mode, the rotor arms are positioned for flight with appropriate degrees of freedom; in ground mode, they fold down to serve as wheels with constrained degrees of freedom. This dynamic adaptation simplifies control by activating only the necessary degrees of freedom for each mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If a simple combination of wheeled and rotorcraft functionalities is achieved, then the robot can switch between configurations, but complete switching between wheel and rotorcraft configurations is not possible, and independent motion modes cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration switchingVSAvoidmotion mode independence
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The robot achieves complete configuration switching through dynamic structural transformation. The four rotor arms can be dynamically positioned in different configurations: extended upward for aerial flight, folded downward for ground wheeled motion, or positioned at intermediate angles for waterborne motion. This dynamic reconfiguration enables complete switching between modes with reliable independent operation of each motion type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The robot achieves independent operation in flight, rolling, and waterborne modes without interference, simplifying control algorithms and expanding application scenarios.

Implementation Method 1

the folding/unfolding motor is configured to drive the connecting elements to control the robot to switch to any one of a multirotor configuration, a wheel configuration, or a waterborne motion configuration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

the rotor component comprises a rotor motor and blades, and the rotor motor is configured to drive the blades to rotate in any one of the flight mode, the rolling mode, or the waterborne motion mode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic Lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 3

a side of the sector-shaped panel that is away from the central panels is mounted with an arc-shaped support component, the arc-shaped support component comprising a buoyancy assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentUS20250370462A1Robot based on origami principles and control method thereof, controller, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
  • US20250370462A1 patent drawing
  • US20250370462A1 patent drawing
  • US20250370462A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot based on origami principles, includes: linkage components, central panels, and a plurality of sector-shaped panels, wherein: two ends of the linkage components are connected to a same number of the sector-shaped panels, with every two adjacent sector-shaped panels connected by a respective one of connecting elements; the central panels are located in a middle of the linkage components, and the central panels are configured for placement of a control assembly, the control assembly comprising a folding/unfolding motor and a motion control system; the folding/unfolding motor is configured to drive the connecting elements to control the robot to switch to any one of a multirotor configuration, a wheel configuration, or a waterborne motion configuration.