ORP Control for Hot Water Wet Layup Corrosion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hot water systems face significant corrosion issues during intermittent operations due to unpredictable REDOX Stress events, which existing monitoring methods fail to detect and control effectively, leading to costly damage and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

Implementing real-time oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) monitoring and control in hot water systems by separating the wet layup sequence into phases and defining operational protective zones, using ORP probes to measure and communicate ORP levels to a controller, which adjusts chemical feed or temperature to maintain optimal ORP settings and prevent corrosion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional monitoring methods are used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision of ORP during intermittent operations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveORP measurement precisionVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the intermittent operation into distinct phases (shutdown, startup, steady-state) and applies phase-specific ORP control settings. The system divides monitoring into multiple operational modes with different thresholds and response strategies, enabling precise measurement appropriate to each phase while managing complexity through structured segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system dynamically adjusts ORP thresholds, measurement frequencies, and control responses based on the detected operational phase. During shutdown and startup phases, the system applies more stringent monitoring with adjusted thresholds compared to steady-state operation, allowing high precision when needed while reducing complexity during stable periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If real-time ORP monitoring and control is implemented, then corrosion protection is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion protectionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous ORP measurement with real-time feedback to chemical dosing equipment. The controller monitors ORP levels and automatically adjusts chemical feed rates to maintain target ORP ranges, creating a closed-loop control system that provides reliable corrosion protection through dynamic adjustment based on actual system conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (chemical dosing rates, ORP thresholds, measurement frequencies) based on detected operational phases and ORP measurements. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the system achieves reliable corrosion protection across varying operating conditions while managing complexity through parameter-based control strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If phase-specific ORP control zones are defined, then manufacturing precision of corrosion control is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion control precisionVSAvoidsystem operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects operational phases and applies appropriate ORP control settings without requiring manual intervention. The controller self-adjusts thresholds, measurement frequencies, and chemical dosing based on phase detection, eliminating the need for operators to manually configure phase-specific parameters while maintaining precise corrosion control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-configures phase-specific ORP control zones and thresholds before operations begin. During shutdown and startup phases, predetermined control strategies are automatically activated, enabling precise corrosion control to be implemented in advance without requiring complex real-time manual adjustments during critical transition periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If chemical feed adjustment is used to control ORP, then corrosion prevention is improved, but loss of substance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion preventionVSAvoidchemical consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies chemical dosing at partial rates during steady-state operation with stable ORP levels, and only increases dosing when ORP measurements indicate corrosion risk during shutdown or startup phases. This selective application of chemical treatment maintains reliable corrosion prevention while minimizing unnecessary chemical consumption during stable operating periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic ORP measurements and adjusts chemical feed rates based on detected phases and measurement results. By measuring and dosing periodically rather than continuously at maximum rates, the system maintains effective corrosion prevention while reducing overall chemical consumption through timed, condition-based application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables real-time detection and control of REDOX Stress events, reducing corrosion, extending equipment life, improving operational efficiency, and optimizing costs by maintaining optimal ORP settings across various phases of the layup sequence.

Implementation Method 1

oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) monitoring and control in hot water systems by separating the wet layup sequence into phases and defining operational protective zones, using ORP probes to measure and communicate ORP levels

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation-reduction potential measurement: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 2

which adjusts chemical feed or temperature to maintain optimal ORP settings and prevent corrosion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 3

which adjusts chemical feed or temperature to maintain optimal ORP settings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature control: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS7951298B2Method and device for preventing corrosion in hot water systems undergoing intermittent operations
Publication Date: 2011.05.31 ECOLAB USA INC
  • US7951298B2 patent drawing
  • US7951298B2 patent drawing
  • US7951298B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method of controlling a real-time oxidation-reduction potential in a hot water system undergoing a wet layup sequence to inhibit corrosion in the hot water system. The method includes separating the wet layup sequence into a plurality of phases. Each phase is either short-term or long-term and a subset of the short-term phases is optionally transitional. The method further includes defining one or more zones in the hot water system. At least one of the defined zones is selected for each phase and one or more of the selected zones include at least one ORP probe operable to measure the real-time ORP and communicate with a controller. The ORP probe(s) either intermittently or continuously measure the real-time ORP at operating temperature and pressure at one or more of the selected zones in one or more of the phases and transmit the measured real-time ORP to the controller. The real-time ORP is assessed to determine whether it conforms to an ORP setting for that phase. The invention further includes a multi-component control device for a hot water system undergoing a wet layup sequence.