Orthogonal Compensation Network for Crosstalk Cancellation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network connectors face challenges in maintaining low crosstalk and return loss across a wide frequency range due to the increasing phase difference and coupling magnitude with frequency, leading to impedance mismatch and poor performance beyond Category 5e requirements.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an orthogonal compensation network (OCN) using a combination of capacitive and mutual inductive couplings, where the mutual inductive coupling grows at a higher rate than capacitive coupling, providing additional compensating signals with specific phase and magnitude characteristics to cancel out offending crosstalk signals effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single compensation stage is implemented to cancel offending crosstalk, then NEXT performance is improved at low frequencies, but phase difference increases at higher frequencies causing incomplete cancellation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNEXT performanceVSAvoidfrequency range coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The compensation network is divided into multiple independent compensation stages, each targeting specific frequency ranges. The first compensation stage handles low-frequency crosstalk cancellation, while the second compensation stage addresses high-frequency crosstalk, allowing each stage to be optimized for its specific frequency range without compromising overall performance across the entire bandwidth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a second compensation stage that operates in parallel with the first stage, adding a temporal and functional dimension to the compensation process. This multi-stage approach enables the system to handle both near-end and far-end crosstalk across different frequency ranges simultaneously, effectively expanding the usable frequency range beyond what a single stage could achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If compensation network is applied within jack to reduce crosstalk, then NEXT performance is improved, but return loss deteriorates due to impedance mismatch

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNEXT performanceVSAvoidreturn loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The compensation network is designed with different impedance characteristics at different locations and frequency ranges. Each compensation stage uses locally optimized impedance values that match the surrounding circuitry at its operating frequency, minimizing reflections and maintaining return loss performance while providing effective crosstalk cancellation in its specific frequency range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs frequency-dependent impedance transformation in the compensation stages, where the impedance parameters are specifically designed to change with frequency. This allows the compensation network to maintain proper impedance matching across different frequency ranges, reducing reflections and maintaining return loss performance while effectively canceling crosstalk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If propagation delay between offending crosstalk signal and compensating signal is reduced, then phase alignment is improved, but physical distance between coupling locations must be minimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase alignmentVSAvoiddistance between coupling locations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The compensation signals are generated and conditioned in advance through carefully designed RC and LC circuits that pre-adjust the phase and amplitude of compensating signals before they are injected into the transmission line. This preliminary conditioning ensures that the compensating signals are properly aligned with the offending crosstalk signals despite the physical distance and propagation delays, eliminating the need for minimal spacing between coupling locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The OCN design achieves improved NEXT performance across a broader frequency range by minimizing the phase delay effect, reducing the sensitivity to manufacturing tolerances, and maintaining better impedance balance, thus enhancing the overall connector performance and compliance with higher bandwidth standards.

Implementation Method 1

a capacitive coupling with a first magnitude growing at a first rate over the range of frequency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitive coupling: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

a mutual inductive coupling with a second magnitude growing at a second rate over the range of frequency, the second rate approximately double the first rate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMutual inductive coupling: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9461418B2Compensation network using an orthogonal compensation network
Publication Date: 2016.10.04 PANDUIT CORP
  • US9461418B2 patent drawing
  • US9461418B2 patent drawing
  • US9461418B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, the present invention is a communication connector, comprising a compensation circuit for providing a compensating signal to approximately cancel an offending signal over a range of frequency, the compensation circuit including a capacitive coupling with a first magnitude growing at a first rate over the range of frequency and a mutual inductive coupling with a second magnitude growing at a second rate over the range of frequency, the second rate being greater than the first rate (e.g., the second rate approximately double the first rate).