Optical Touch Control With Orthogonal Modulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optical touch systems face interference issues due to the limited range of usable frequencies for amplitude modulation, leading to prolonged scanning times and reduced accuracy in detecting touch events and mechanical control device status.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a modulation scheme where multiple optical emitters are driven with orthogonal modulation functions, allowing simultaneous emission and correlation of energy received by detectors to distinguish between emitter signals and reduce interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If amplitude modulation with fixed frequency is used, then interference from external sources increases, but changing frequency range is limited by detector response times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal accuracyVSAvoidexternal interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the modulation parameter from fixed frequency amplitude modulation to time-varying intensity patterns with characteristic transitions. Each emitter uses a unique temporal pattern that includes specific rise and fall times, allowing detectors to distinguish between different emitters based on their temporal signatures rather than frequency separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic scanning sequences where emitters are activated in predetermined patterns. The scanning sequence repeats over time with each emitter having a unique activation pattern, creating periodic temporal signatures that can be correlated at the detector to identify signal sources and filter interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Productivity

If sequential beam scanning is used, then scanning time is prolonged, but simultaneous emission from multiple emitters causes signal interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning speedVSAvoidsignal resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple emitter operations by allowing simultaneous emission from multiple emitters. Instead of sequential scanning, multiple emitters operate concurrently with unique temporal patterns, and the detector combines these signals through correlation processing to resolve individual contributions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses correlation processing as a feedback mechanism where detector outputs are correlated with predetermined emitter patterns. This correlation process provides feedback information that enables the system to distinguish between simultaneous emitter signals and filter out interference, maintaining signal resolution despite parallel operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If multiple emitters operate simultaneously, then scanning efficiency improves, but distinguishing between emitter signals becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning efficiencyVSAvoidsignal differentiation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by establishing unique temporal patterns for each emitter before operation begins. These predetermined patterns serve as reference signatures that simplify the detection process, as detectors can correlate incoming signals against these known patterns to easily differentiate between simultaneous emitter sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach accelerates the scanning process, enhances accuracy by minimizing interference, and improves signal resolution through noise averaging, while maintaining efficient power usage and reduced peak current demand.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of optical emitters and a plurality of optical detectors defining therebetween an area of optical paths whereby the transmission of energy between an emitter and a detector may be modulated by an optical interaction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical energy transmission: Light

Implementation Method 2

The touch sensitive area may be an optically transparent planar waveguide through which the beams pass by total internal reflection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTotal internal reflection: Total Internal Reflection

Implementation Method 3

An object such as a finger or a stylus coming into contact with the transparent waveguide will have a higher refractive index than the air normally surrounding the waveguide. The increase in refractive index will disrupt total internal reflection of light energy at the interface between the waveguide and the touching object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Implementation Method 4

This modulating signal can be applied to an emitter by using it to modulate the current flowing through the emitter, which is usually be a current controlled device such as an LED

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight emitting diode modulation: Light Emitting Diode

Data Source

PatentUS9086762B2Optical control system with modulated emitters
Publication Date: 2015.07.21 BEECHROCK LTD
  • US9086762B2 patent drawing
  • US9086762B2 patent drawing
  • US9086762B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optical control system is described, which employs a series of optical emitters and detectors arranged about a touch area. The emitters are driven by a series of functions, and the system is operable to correlate the signals received at the detectors with the functions to determine the amount of energy received by the detectors from each of the emitters. This system means that all or many emitters can be modulated simultaneously, so the scanning process is accelerated. Also, the energy estimates arrived at by correlation with the functions are largely unaffected by external interference signals as well by each other. An additional benefit of the present invention is that the correlation processing makes use of many detector samples and tends to yield results which have higher resolution than the sample values themselves, due to the averaging of noise over the sample set.