Orthogonal Lifting Mechanism for Inkjet Head Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ink jet type recording apparatuses face challenges in size increase and positional accuracy due to the placement of lifting-lowering mechanisms, leading to tilting and inaccurate ink droplet placement on the ejection target medium.

Innovation Solution

The lifting-lowering mechanisms are positioned orthogonally to the alignment direction of the liquid ejecting heads, with a unit base supported by multiple bearings and a tilt adjusting mechanism, allowing for precise positioning and reduced size in the alignment direction, and incorporating an eccentric cam and rotary shaft for simplified structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If lifting-lowering mechanisms are disposed on both sides in the alignment direction of the ink jet type recording heads, then the ink jet type recording head unit can be lifted and lowered, but the ink jet type recording apparatus is more increased in size in the alignment direction of the ink jet type recording heads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifting and lowering capabilityVSAvoidapparatus size in alignment direction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The lifting-lowering mechanism is repositioned from the alignment direction (longitudinal direction of the head unit) to the width direction (lateral direction), allowing the mechanism to function without increasing the apparatus length in the alignment direction. This dimensional repositioning resolves the contradiction by maintaining lifting capability while reducing apparatus size in the critical alignment direction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If the eccentric cam provided on the apparatus main body side comes into contact with the driven cam provided on the ink jet type recording head unit side, then the ink jet type recording head unit can be lifted and lowered, but it is not possible to position a nozzle-formed surface with high accuracy due to dimensional tolerance of components, positional shifts of components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifting and lowering capabilityVSAvoidnozzle-formed surface positioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cam-based mechanical lifting mechanism is replaced with a linear motor-driven direct drive system. The linear motor provides precise positional control through electrical control, eliminating the cumulative errors from cam eccentricity, dimensional tolerances, and component wear. This substitution of mechanical transmission with direct electromagnetic actuation resolves the positioning accuracy issue while maintaining lifting capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If it is possible to lift and lower the ink jet type recording head unit with respect to a shaft, then the head unit can be positioned, but the ink jet type recording head unit tilts in a direction inclined to a lifting-lowering direction with respect to the shaft, and thereby ink droplets lands at a shifted position on an ejection target medium

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning capabilityVSAvoidink droplet placement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The shaft-based lifting mechanism is replaced with a linear motor-driven direct lift system. The linear motor provides vertically aligned force application, eliminating the tilting moment that occurs with shaft-based mechanisms. This direct drive approach ensures the head unit moves purely in the vertical direction without rotation or tilt, maintaining both positioning capability and droplet placement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple lifting-lowering mechanisms are added to improve positioning accuracy, then positioning accuracy can be enhanced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple complex mechanical lifting mechanisms are replaced with a single linear motor-driven system. The linear motor's inherent precision and direct drive capability eliminate the need for multiple mechanisms, cam pairs, or shaft assemblies. This substitution reduces device complexity significantly while achieving superior positioning accuracy through electrical control and direct force application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces the size of the liquid ejecting apparatus in the alignment direction, enhances positional accuracy, and minimizes tilting, resulting in improved print quality by accurately positioning the nozzle-formed surface.

Implementation Method 1

a lifting-lowering mechanism including a rotary shaft that is rotated about an axis in the third direction, an eccentric cam that is rotated together with the rotary shaft, and a head unit that is lifted and lowered in the third direction by the eccentric cam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEccentric cam mechanism: Cam

Data Source

PatentUS10226952B2Liquid ejecting apparatus
Publication Date: 2019.03.12 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US10226952B2 patent drawing
  • US10226952B2 patent drawing
  • US10226952B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A liquid ejecting apparatus includes: an apparatus main body; a plurality of liquid ejecting heads that have a nozzle-formed surface; a unit base to which the plurality of liquid ejecting heads are fixed; and a lifting-lowering mechanism that is fixed to the apparatus main body and causes a position of the nozzle-formed surface to be shifted with respect to the apparatus main body. The lifting-lowering mechanisms are disposed in a direction orthogonal to a direction in which the plurality of liquid ejecting heads are aligned, in an in-plane direction of the nozzle-formed surface.