Orthogonal Multi-Row Touch Panel Stimulation for Fast Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional touch screen devices face limitations such as high current drain, poor response time, especially under fast motion, and performance degradation in extreme conditions with electromagnetic interference and contaminants.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of orthogonal multi-row stimulation logic and asymmetric scanning logic in capacitive touch panels, which allows for simultaneous stimulation of multiple rows and adaptive scanning to improve signal-to-noise ratio and reduce power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional single-row sequential stimulation is used, then device complexity is low, but response time is poor especially under fast motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidstimulation logic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The touch panel rows are divided into multiple groups, with each group stimulated by a dedicated stimulation logic unit. This segmentation allows parallel processing of multiple row groups simultaneously, significantly improving response time while keeping each individual stimulation logic unit relatively simple in structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple stimulation logic units are combined to work together in parallel, each handling a specific group of rows. This merging of multiple simple units achieves the effect of complex parallel processing without requiring a single overly complex stimulation logic unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Loss of energy

If conventional scanning methods are used, then power consumption is moderate, but current drain is too great affecting power dissipation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower dissipationVSAvoidcurrent drain
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The stimulation logic employs periodic scanning cycles where multiple rows are stimulated in alternating phases. During each phase, only a subset of rows is actively stimulated while others are in a low-power state, reducing overall current drain and power dissipation compared to continuous scanning of all rows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of stimulating all rows simultaneously or sequentially with equal intensity, the system applies partial stimulation to multiple rows in parallel. This partial action approach reduces the peak current demand on any single row while maintaining overall touch detection capability, thereby reducing power dissipation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If conventional touch screen stimulation is used, then basic functionality is achieved, but performance degrades in environments with electromagnetic interference and contaminants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance in extreme conditionsVSAvoidelectromagnetic interference and contaminants
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The touch controller incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor the quality of touch signals and adaptively adjust stimulation parameters. When electromagnetic interference or contaminants are detected, the system can increase stimulation intensity or adjust scanning patterns to maintain reliable touch detection despite adverse environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The stimulation logic dynamically changes operational parameters such as stimulation frequency, amplitude, and scanning patterns based on detected environmental conditions. These parameter adjustments allow the system to maintain optimal performance in extreme conditions with electromagnetic interference and contaminants by adapting to the specific interference characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the performance and durability of touch screen devices by improving response time and reducing power consumption while maintaining effectiveness in challenging environments.

Implementation Method 1

conventional touch screen devices have been limited in their usage to date. For some devices, current drain has been too great.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS8937606B2Orthogonal multi-row touch panel stimulation
Publication Date: 2015.01.20 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US8937606B2 patent drawing
  • US8937606B2 patent drawing
  • US8937606B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Control circuitry for a touch panel includes a touch panel interface, a memory comprising scanning logic, and a controller in communication with the memory and the touch panel interface. The controller is operable, when the scanning logic is executed, to energize a first and a second row in the touch panel simultaneously, a first time; obtain a first signal measurement along a column intersecting the first and second rows; energize the first and the second row in the touch panel simultaneously, a second time; obtain a second signal measurement along the column; and determine a first pixel value and a second pixel value along the column from the first signal measurement and the second signal measurement.