Orthopaedic Fastener Square Cross-Section Expansion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fasteners used in orthopaedic stabilization devices face limitations in expansion size due to high area moment of inertia, leading to restricted pull-out strength and stability, especially in bone applications.

Innovation Solution

A fastener with a substantially square cross-sectional shape is designed to minimize expansion force and allow maximum expansion without plastic deformation, featuring a unique shape with parallel edges and rounded corners, enabling elastic deformation and increased rotational stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional fasteners with high area moment of inertia are used, then structural strength is maintained, but expansion size is limited and pull-out strength is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepull-out strengthVSAvoidcross-sectional shape
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by transitioning from a conventional circular cross-section to a square cross-section with rounded corners. This asymmetric shape reduces the area moment of inertia compared to a circular section of equivalent area, enabling greater expansion capability while maintaining structural strength. The square geometry with rounded corners optimizes the balance between expansion potential and resistance to plastic deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the fastener body by adopting a square cross-section with rounded corners instead of a circular one. This parameter change reduces the area moment of inertia, allowing the fastener to achieve larger expansion sizes and improved pull-out strength while preventing plastic deformation through optimized dimensional ratios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If the fastener is designed for maximum expansion, then elastic deformation capability increases, but resistance to plastic deformation must be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelastic deformation capabilityVSAvoidresistance to plastic deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite structural design where the square cross-section with rounded corners creates a geometry that optimizes both elastic deformation capability and resistance to plastic deformation. The rounded corners specifically prevent stress concentration that would lead to plastic deformation, while the overall square shape enables greater expansion capacity through reduced area moment of inertia.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by rounding only the corners of the square cross-section while maintaining straight edges elsewhere. This localized modification specifically addresses stress concentration at corner regions, preventing plastic deformation initiation, while preserving the overall square geometry's advantage of reduced area moment of inertia for enhanced elastic deformation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The fastener achieves higher yield and ultimate loads, reduced variance in failure loads, and increased fatigue performance, with a 41% higher failure load and 43% higher maximum load compared to conventional orthopaedic screws, while being less dependent on bone density.

Implementation Method 1

the at least one body portion being arranged such that at least a part of the at least one body portion is urged away from the axis when an actuating member is received along the axis and urges against the actuating surface portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The cross-sectional shape of the at least one body portion at the predefined location may be shaped such that a bending modulus of the at least one body portion at the predefined location is minimised and such that maximum expansion of the fastener without plastic deformation is allowed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation resistance: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3111099B1A fastener
Publication Date: 2020.04.01 CURTAIN UNIV OF TECH
  • EP3111099B1 patent drawingFigure 1~5
  • EP3111099B1 patent drawingFigure 6~8
  • EP3111099B1 patent drawingFigure 9~10

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a fastener that has a body that has an axis. The body comprises a head portion and at least one body portion projecting from the head portion. The at least one body portion has an actuating surface portion and is arranged such that at least a part of the at least one body portion is urged away from the axis when an actuating member is received along the axis and urges against the actuating surface portion. The at least one body portion has a substantially flat surface portion facing away from the axis.