Patient-Specific Orthopaedic Implant Optimization Algorithms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies face challenges in identifying optimal implant geometries and positions for orthopaedic procedures, particularly in complex joints like the knee, due to limited size options and complexities in joint performance.

Innovation Solution

The use of patient-specific information and optimization algorithms to determine optimal implant designs, sizes, positions, and orientations for individual patients, incorporating anatomic and biomechanic fit parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current technologies are used to identify implant geometries and positions, then the procedure can be performed with available tools, but the optimal joint function cannot be achieved due to limited size options and joint complexities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint functionVSAvoidimplant size options
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from discrete, limited implant size options to continuous, customizable implant parameters. The system allows modification of implant geometry, size, and position parameters to precisely match patient-specific joint characteristics, thereby achieving optimal joint function while overcoming the limitation of fixed size options in conventional implants

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by performing pre-operative planning and optimization calculations before the actual implantation procedure. The system uses patient-specific joint data to determine optimal implant parameters in advance, allowing surgeons to proceed with precisely tailored implants rather than selecting from limited pre-fabricated size options during surgery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If patient-specific optimization is performed, then anatomic and biomechanic fit is improved, but the complexity of the procedure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant fit precisionVSAvoidoptimization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual trial-and-fit mechanical procedures with computer-based optimization algorithms. The system uses computational methods to calculate optimal implant parameters based on patient-specific data, substituting complex manual measurement and adjustment processes with automated digital planning and precision manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates precise digital copies of patient-specific joint anatomy through imaging and modeling. These digital replicas serve as the basis for optimization calculations, allowing virtual testing and refinement of implant parameters before actual implantation, thereby achieving high precision without proportionally increasing physical procedure complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12201366B2Systems and methods for optimizing parameters of orthopaedic procedures
Publication Date: 2025.01.21 SMITH & NEPHEW INC
  • US12201366B2 patent drawing
  • US12201366B2 patent drawing
  • US12201366B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for optimizing parameters of an orthopaedic procedure for a particular patient, including parameters relating to the anatomic and biomechanic fit of an implant or implant system implanted into the patient's joint. These systems and methods may utilize patient-specific information gathered pre-operatively in conjunction with optimization algorithms to determine an optimal implant design and an optimal position and orientation for implantation of the implant into the particular patient's joint.