Patient-Specific Orthopedic Implant Evaluation Using Bone Density Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional arthroplasty procedures face challenges in accurately evaluating bone density pre-operatively and intra-operatively, leading to suboptimal implant selection, bone damage during surgery, and adverse post-operative outcomes such as loosening and stress shielding.

Innovation Solution

The use of patient-specific bone density information to simulate pre-operative and intra-operative scenarios for orthopedic implant procedures, allowing for the selection of optimal implant locations and types, and providing predictive feedback on surgical outcomes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional arthroplasty procedures are used without bone density evaluation, then the surgical procedure can be performed more quickly and with less complexity, but the implant selection and placement precision deteriorate, leading to suboptimal outcomes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant placement precisionVSAvoidsurgical planning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary bone density evaluation and virtual surgical planning before the actual surgery. By pre-evaluating bone density and simulating implant placement scenarios, the system prepares optimized surgical plans in advance, improving implant placement precision without adding complexity during the surgical procedure itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual 3D copy of the patient's bone structure from imaging data, allowing simulation and evaluation of implant placement scenarios without physically trying different approaches on the actual patient. This virtual modeling enables precise planning while keeping the physical surgical process straightforward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If bone density information is obtained and used for implant planning, then the reliability of implant fixation improves, but the measurement and evaluation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant fixation reliabilityVSAvoidbone density measurement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses imaging data (such as CT scans) as an intermediary to indirectly measure bone density. Instead of directly measuring bone density, which would be complex and invasive, the system processes imaging data to extract bone density information, simplifying the measurement process while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical bone density measurement techniques with computational methods that process imaging data. By substituting physical measurement approaches with digital image analysis and simulation, the system reduces measurement complexity while improving fixation reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple implant scenarios are simulated and evaluated, then the selection of optimal implant location and type improves, but the time required for planning increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant selection precisionVSAvoidpreoperative planning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback by simulating multiple implant scenarios and evaluating their outcomes based on bone density information. By presenting the surgeon with predicted results for different implant options, the system enables informed decision-making that reduces the need for time-consuming trial-and-error planning, actually accelerating the selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system efficiently evaluates multiple implant scenarios by systematically varying key parameters such as implant location, orientation, and type within the virtual model. This parameter-based approach to scenario generation allows rapid evaluation of many options without proportionally increasing planning time, as the simulations can be executed quickly using computational methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250195143A1Patient-specific orthopedic implant evaluation
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 ZIMMER INC
  • US20250195143A1 patent drawing
  • US20250195143A1 patent drawing
  • US20250195143A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method of determining fixation of a prosthesis in bone matter based on bone anatomy and density information comprises generating a three-dimensional model of a bone of a patient for output in a video display unit, adding three-dimensional bone density information for the bone matter to the three-dimensional model, simulating a. preparation of the bone to produce a bone surface on the three-dimensional model, simulating placement of the prosthesis in the bone surface, estimating a fixation strength of the prosthesis to the bone matter using the bone density information at the prosthesis, and outputting indicia on the video display unit that indicates risk factors for displacement, of the prosthesis from the bone matter.