Orthopedic Implant Surface Texture for Bone Ingrowth

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current orthopaedic prosthetic components face challenges in achieving stable bone ingrowth and preventing debris formation during implantation due to the design of existing surface features, which can lead to inadequate fixation and increased risk of breakage.

Innovation Solution

A porous three-dimensional structure with engagement studs extending from its surface, featuring a cone or pyramid shape, is designed to promote bone ingrowth and minimize debris formation, where the studs are integrated with the structure and have a specific height and orientation to enhance static friction and structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If traditional sintered porous coatings or additive manufacturing structures with protruding particles or cylindrical spikes are used, then initial friction with bone is increased, but the structures are prone to breaking during impaction and generate significant debris

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial friction with boneVSAvoidresistance to breaking during impaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The surface features are segmented into multiple engagement studs with varying heights rather than uniform protrusions. This segmentation creates a progressive engagement mechanism where shorter studs engage first, followed by taller ones, distributing the impact force across multiple elements and reducing the likelihood of any single feature breaking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the implant surface have engagement studs with different heights (first height and second height greater than first). This local quality variation allows the implant to provide different levels of engagement and friction at different locations, optimizing both initial fixation and resistance to breakage during impaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If engagement structures with greater height are used to increase friction and mechanical interlock, then bone ingrowth is promoted, but the risk of debris formation during impaction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical interlock with boneVSAvoiddebris formation during impaction
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The engagement structures are divided into multiple studs of varying heights rather than using a single uniform height. This segmentation allows the implant to engage bone progressively, with shorter studs making initial contact and taller studs providing additional mechanical interlock, thereby achieving strong bone ingrowth promotion without requiring any single feature to be excessively tall and debris-prone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The height parameter of engagement studs is varied across different locations on the implant surface. By changing this geometric parameter, the design optimizes the balance between mechanical interlock strength and debris generation, ensuring that no single stud is so tall as to be fragile yet the collective structure provides sufficient engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If random particles or uniform cylindrical spikes are used as surface features, then manufacturing is simplified, but the implant lacks stable mechanical interlock and is prone to breakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of surface feature creationVSAvoidstability of implant-bone interface
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The implant surface features are designed with local quality variations, specifically engagement studs of different heights at different locations. This provides stable mechanical interlock through progressive engagement while remaining compatible with additive manufacturing processes that can easily vary geometric parameters during construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The design adds height as a varying dimension to the engagement studs, transitioning from uniform two-dimensional surface patterns to three-dimensional structures with varying prominence. This dimensional variation enhances mechanical interlock stability while still being manufacturable through modern additive processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP3758653B1Surface textures for three-dimensional porous structures for bone ingrowth
Publication Date: 2024.03.06 DEPUY SYNTHES PROD INC
  • EP3758653B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3758653B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3758653B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An orthopaedic prosthetic component is provided. The prosthetic component comprises a base, a porous three-dimensional structure and at least one engagement stud extending past a surface boundary of the porous three-dimensional structure to engage a patient's bone.