Orthopedic Support Element Overlap Production via 3D Mold Casting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing orthopedic support elements, such as the rolling and conventional molding methods, are limited in size and complexity, leading to issues with edge length constraints, material deaeration, and sagging, making it difficult to create large or complex orthoses like those for the torso, and require significant manual labor and complex mold production.

Innovation Solution

A method using a casting mold with an inner and outer mold, where the outer mold surrounds the overlapping portion on both sides, allowing for greater design freedom and precise production of orthopedic support elements with an overlapping region that can completely cover body parts, using digital and 3D printing techniques to create molds and cast silicone materials effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the rolling method is used to produce orthopedic support elements, then the production process is relatively simple, but the edge length is constrained and cannot be used for large orthoses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction process simplicityVSAvoidedge length of orthosis
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The production process is divided into multiple sequential rolling operations. The orthotic device is produced in sections, with each rolling operation covering a specific portion. The material is rolled sequentially to extend the effective edge length beyond the limitations of a single rolling operation, enabling production of large orthoses while maintaining the simplicity of the rolling method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If manual deaeration is performed by puncturing gas bubbles on the roller, then the material can be degassed, but the process becomes particularly complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial deaerationVSAvoiddeaeration process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A vacuum chamber is introduced as an intermediary device to perform deaeration. The rolled material is placed in the vacuum chamber where reduced pressure causes gas bubbles to rise and be removed from the material. This automated vacuum deaeration process replaces the complex manual puncturing method, maintaining effective gas removal while significantly reducing process complexity and manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If silicone is deposited before reaching the end of its pot life, then the material can be applied, but it sags and runs visibly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepot life utilizationVSAvoidmaterial stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The silicone material is prepared and positioned in advance within a mold or support structure before the end of its pot life. The mold provides immediate structural support that prevents sagging and running. By pre-positioning the material in its final configuration with supportive fixtures in place, the material maintains its shape throughout the remaining pot life and during the vulcanization process, eliminating sagging issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If the conventional molding method is used, then orthopedic support elements can be produced, but the production of casting molds is complex and requires high proportion of manual work

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorthosis production capabilityVSAvoidcasting mold production complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of creating complex custom casting molds for each orthosis, the invention uses 3D scanning to create a digital copy of the patient's body part. This digital model is then used to generate the orthosis design and guide the rolling production process. The digital copy replaces the need for physical casting molds, eliminating the complex mold production step while maintaining the ability to produce precise, customized orthopedic support elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

5Productivity

If the rolling method is used, then production can be performed, but it cannot be used for orthopedic support elements with overlapping portions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction capabilityVSAvoiddesign flexibility for overlapping portions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from a two-dimensional rolling process to a three-dimensional construction approach using multiple layers. Overlapping portions are achieved by rolling separate sections of the orthosis with overlaps, then bonding them together to form a three-dimensional structure. This multi-layer construction method enables the production of orthopedic support elements with overlapping portions while maintaining the productivity benefits of the rolling process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20230255810A1Method for producing an orthopaedic support element, and orthopaedic support element
Publication Date: 2023.08.17 HAHLBROCK DAVID
  • US20230255810A1 patent drawing
  • US20230255810A1 patent drawing
  • US20230255810A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for producing an orthopaedic support element (1) having an overlap portion (2) in which the orthopaedic support element overlaps itself when it is applied to a body part that is to be corrected, wherein a manufacturing configuration (25) of the orthopaedic support element (1) is predefined for the production thereof, which manufacturing configuration (25) deviates from a therapy configuration (26) of the orthopaedic support element (1) when applying the latter to the body part that is to be corrected, wherein in the manufacturing configuration (25), in the overlap portion (2), a spacing (24) exists between a first open end (22) and the second open end (23) of the orthopaedic support element (1), which spacing (24) is not present in the therapy configuration (26).