Orthotic Shell Shank Deflection for Foot Arch Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Flip-flops lack adequate orthotic support, leading to musculoskeletal issues and abnormal biomechanics due to their thin, flat soles, which fail to provide proper heel and arch support, causing compensatory foot adjustments and discomfort.

Innovation Solution

An orthotic shell integrated into the sole of footwear, featuring a semi-rigid material that supports the heel and forefoot, with a dynamic shank to promote natural gait and adaptability, providing prolonged contact and stability across various foot types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If flip-flops use thin, flat soles for simplicity and low cost, then manufacturing cost and simplicity are improved, but orthotic support and foot health are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of constructionVSAvoidmusculoskeletal damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The orthotic shell is nested within the footwear sole structure, with the insole platform positioned between the orthotic shell and the external environment. This nesting approach integrates orthotic support into the existing footwear design without requiring complete redesign, maintaining manufacturing simplicity while adding health benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material construction with the orthotic shell made from semi-rigid material that is relatively more rigid than the insole platform material. This composite approach provides the necessary structural support for orthotic function while maintaining the flexibility and comfort characteristics of the softer insole materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Adaptability or versatility

If generic orthotics are made soft and contoured for comfort, then adaptability is improved, but supportive function is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomfort and adaptabilityVSAvoidsupportive function
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The orthotic shell features differentiated local properties with specific structural elements: a heel portion for heel support, a forefoot portion for forefoot support near the metatarsal heads, and a shank portion connecting these regions. Each portion is optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall structural integrity and support capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If footwear lacks intrinsic orthotic design, then device complexity is reduced, but biomechanical control is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefootwear structureVSAvoidbiomechanical control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The orthotic shell serves multiple functions within a single integrated structure: it provides arch support, heel support, forefoot support, and biomechanical control simultaneously. The insole platform and orthotic shell work together as a unified system that delivers both comfort and functional support without requiring multiple separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10667574B2Functional orthotic support structure for footwear
Publication Date: 2020.06.02 RADOVIC PHILIP ANDREW
  • US10667574B2 patent drawing
  • US10667574B2 patent drawing
  • US10667574B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An orthotic support structure or shell may be used with footwear intrinsically or as a removable and transferable device. The footwear may be a sandal assembly including a sole, a strap and an orthotic shell. The strap is attached to the sole and configured to secure the sole against the foot. The orthotic shell is positioned within the sole and formed from a semi-rigid material. The orthotic shell includes a heel portion configured to support a heel region of the foot, and a midfoot portion connected to the heel portion and configured to support an arch region of the foot, the midfoot portion comprising an arched shank having a curved convex shape. The arched shank is configured to deflect under a downward force applied thereon which reactively rotates the heel portion toward the heel region of the foot.