Load-Adaptive Orthotic Strut for Patient-Specific Energy Return

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional orthotic and prosthetic devices lack adaptability to individual patient biomechanics, leading to inefficient load transfer, energy return, and increased fatigue due to rigid components and static connection geometries.

Innovation Solution

A load-adaptive strut designed using computational methods with adjustable connection points and materials like carbon fibers and advanced polymers, tailored through finite element analysis for patient-specific parameters, allowing real-time adjustments for improved mechanical compatibility and energy return.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional rigid components and static connection geometries are used in orthotic devices, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to patient-specific biomechanics deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to patient-specific biomechanicsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements adjustable connection points that allow dynamic modification of compound angles, offsets, and depths to adapt to varying patient biomechanics and gait phases. This enables the device to transition from static to dynamic configuration, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity by providing adjustability where needed while maintaining overall structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs computational design with finite element analysis to optimize structural parameters based on patient-specific data. By varying geometric parameters (compound angles, offsets, depths) and material properties, the device achieves custom adaptability without requiring complete redesign, thus managing complexity while improving fit and function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If predetermined load transfer is used during manufacture, then manufacturing process is simplified, but mechanical compatibility with variable patient biomechanics deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidmechanical compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs computational design and finite element analysis during the manufacturing planning stage to predetermined optimize load transfer paths based on patient-specific parameters. This preliminary optimization ensures mechanical compatibility is built into the design before manufacture, allowing standard manufacturing processes to produce a customized, reliable device without requiring complex post-manufacturing adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of energy

If conventional energy storage and release mechanisms are used, then device simplicity is maintained, but energy return efficiency deteriorates due to inability to mimic natural limb function

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy return efficiencyVSAvoidmechanical compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements functionally graded structures with varying material properties and geometric characteristics at different locations within the device. This allows different regions to perform specialized functions (energy storage, damping, structural support) with optimized local properties, improving overall energy return efficiency while maintaining a unified device structure rather than adding separate complex mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250387252A1Orthotic Leg Brace
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 LIMBOLOGY LLC
  • US20250387252A1 patent drawing
  • US20250387252A1 patent drawing
  • US20250387252A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are a load-adaptive strut for an orthotic or prosthetic device, a device for supporting or replacing a patient's limb, and a method of designing such devices. The strut comprises a structural element configured by computational design using finite element analysis to adjust load transfer and energy return profiles based on simulation data derived from patient-specific parameters, and adjustable connection points allowing variations in compound angles, offsets, and/or depths. Also provided are embodiments in which means for adjusting load transfer and energy return profiles and means for adjusting connection points are disclosed. The method comprises obtaining patient-specific parameters, performing finite element analysis to determine a computationally designed geometry that modulates load transfer and energy return profiles, and configuring adjustable connection points with compound angles, offsets, or depths based on simulation data.