Oscillating Tool Blade With Two-Tier Cutting for Gang Box Openings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing oscillating power tool blades lack versatility in cutting operations, requiring multiple blades for different cut sizes and types, which is inefficient and inconvenient.

Innovation Solution

A blade design with two-tiered cutting edges, allowing for two different sized cuts using a single blade by controlling the depth of plunge, featuring offset cutting edges that provide push and pull cutting capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single blade is used for all cutting operations, then device complexity is reduced, but cutting versatility is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting versatilityVSAvoidblade structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is segmented into multiple cutting edges (first cutting edge, second cutting edge, third cutting edge) positioned at different locations and orientations. Each cutting edge can be independently engaged with the workpiece depending on the cutting direction and depth, allowing a single blade to perform multiple cutting functions without increasing overall structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blade is designed as a universal cutting tool that can perform push cutting, pull cutting, and two-tiered push cutting operations. The multiple cutting edges are strategically positioned to enable the blade to handle various cutting scenarios (different depths, directions, and workpiece types) with a single blade, eliminating the need for multiple specialized blades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If multiple blades are used for different cut sizes, then cutting versatility is improved, but operational efficiency decreases due to blade changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcutting capability range
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The blade incorporates multiple cutting edges (first, second, and third cutting edges) that can be selectively engaged based on the required cut size and type. The first and second cutting edges enable two-tiered push cutting for different depth requirements, while the third cutting edge provides additional cutting capability. This multi-functional design allows operators to perform various cutting operations without changing blades, significantly improving operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The blade design allows dynamic selection of cutting edges based on operational requirements. The oscillating mechanism enables the blade to engage different cutting edges at different phases of the oscillation cycle, providing adaptable cutting capabilities for different workpiece thicknesses and cutting directions without requiring physical blade changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If cutting edges are positioned for both push and pull cutting, then cutting versatility is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting direction capabilityVSAvoidcutting edge positioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting edges are segmented and positioned at specific locations: the first cutting edge is positioned to engage during push cutting, the second cutting edge is positioned for pull cutting, and the third cutting edge provides additional push cutting capability. This segmentation allows each cutting edge to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall blade integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blade employs asymmetric positioning of cutting edges to accommodate different cutting directions. The first, second, and third cutting edges are positioned at asymmetric locations relative to the blade centerline, enabling the blade to effectively perform both push and pull cutting operations. This asymmetric design naturally accommodates the different force vectors and cutting mechanics of push versus pull cutting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentEP4037858B1Cutting blade for an oscillating power tool
Publication Date: 2026.01.21 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP
  • EP4037858B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4037858B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4037858B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5

AI summary

A blade having an attachment portion including an aperture defining an anchor center, the attachment portion configured to couple with an oscillating power tool. The blade also has a first blade portion having a first cutting edge, and a second blade portion having a second cutting edge. The first and second blade portions are generally coplanar and extend away from the attachment portion in an outward direction. The first cutting edge has a first horizontal linear dimension measured perpendicular to the outward direction, the first horizontal linear dimension being 3.5 to 4.0 inches to generally correspond with a first dimension of a single outlet gang box. The second cutting edge has a second horizontal linear dimension measured perpendicular to the outward direction, the second horizontal linear dimension being 2.1 to 2.6 inches to generally correspond with a second dimension of the single outlet gang box.