Oscillating Tool Blade Teeth Layout for Nail-Embedded Wood

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Oscillating power tools lack accessories with cutting edges that effectively handle cutting tasks, especially when dealing with wood embedded with nails or metal pieces, as existing tools often have short blade life and inefficient cutting speeds.

Innovation Solution

The development of oscillating accessories with asymmetrically arranged teeth on a slanted cutting edge, where the leading tooth is farther from the rear end than the trailing tooth, and intermediate teeth are positioned between them, allowing for efficient cutting in one direction and debris clearance in the opposite direction, enhancing durability and cutting speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional symmetric teeth arrangement is used, then manufacturing is simple, but cutting speed and blade life are insufficient when cutting nail-embedded wood

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting speedVSAvoidteeth arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by arranging teeth at different distances from the rear end of the working portion. Specifically, the leading tooth is positioned at a first distance from the rear end, while the trailing tooth is positioned at a second distance that is less than the first distance. This asymmetric arrangement optimizes cutting performance on nail-embedded wood by creating favorable tooth engagement angles while maintaining manufacturability through precise positioning rather than complex patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Duration of action of moving object

If conventional symmetric teeth arrangement is used, then structural simplicity is maintained, but blade life is short when cutting hard materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade lifeVSAvoidteeth configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric tooth arrangement with the leading tooth farther from the rear end than the trailing tooth creates optimized cutting angles that reduce tooth impact forces on nail-embedded wood. This extends blade life by preventing premature tooth fracture while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure that is easier to manufacture than fully symmetric designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating tooth positions based on their functional requirements. The leading tooth is positioned farther back to create a more gradual engagement angle for initial cutting, while trailing teeth are positioned closer to maintain structural integrity. This localized optimization of tooth positioning enhances overall blade durability without requiring complete redesign of the entire tooth pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If asymmetric tooth arrangement with leading tooth farther from rear end is used, then cutting speed increases, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting speedVSAvoidtooth positioning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements asymmetry with specific distance relationships: the leading tooth is positioned at a first distance from the rear end, and the trailing tooth is positioned at a second distance less than the first distance. This controlled asymmetric arrangement achieves superior cutting speed on nail-embedded wood while maintaining reasonable manufacturing precision requirements through defined geometric relationships rather than arbitrary positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Ease of operation

If asymmetric tooth arrangement is used, then debris clearance efficiency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris clearance efficiencyVSAvoidcutting edge geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric tooth arrangement facilitates improved debris clearance by creating natural gaps and varying engagement angles as the blade oscillates. The leading tooth positioned farther from the rear end creates space for chip evacuation, while the trailing tooth positioned closer maintains cutting effectiveness. This asymmetric geometry enhances operational efficiency with only moderate increases in manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS20240351121A1Accessories for oscillating power tools
Publication Date: 2024.10.24 BLACK & DECKER CORP
  • US20240351121A1 patent drawing
  • US20240351121A1 patent drawing
  • US20240351121A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An accessory for oscillating power tools includes an attachment portion and a working portion extending along an axis and including a rear end portion, a front end portion with a cutting edge, a first lateral non-cutting edge, and a second lateral non-cutting edge. The cutting edge includes a first subset of teeth including at least one first tooth extending from the first lateral edge toward the axis, a second subset of teeth including at least one second tooth extending from the second lateral edge toward the tool axis, and a third subset of teeth including at least one third tooth disposed between the first subset of teeth and the second subset of teeth and intersecting the axis. Each first tooth and each second tooth has a first configuration and each third tooth has a second configuration that is different from the first configuration.