Oscillating Element for Garage Door Dead Point

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Overhead swinging gates or doors face issues with the 'dead point' where they cannot be fully opened or closed due to mechanisms that only exert vertical force, leading to cumbersome and expensive solutions with high risks of mechanical failure and user safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

An oscillating element with a reciprocating motion, fixed coaxially to an electric motor, is used to apply a radial force to the door, ensuring engagement and overcoming friction, while a separate motorized system handles lifting and lowering, with slip detection for rope systems to prevent accidents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a chain ring mechanism is used to overcome the dead point, then the door can be opened and closed completely, but the mechanism becomes cumbersome horizontally and expensive to install

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplete door opening/closing capabilityVSAvoidhorizontal space requirement and installation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The door opening/closing function is divided into two independent parts: (1) a lifting mechanism for vertical movement, and (2) an oscillating element for horizontal positioning to overcome the dead point. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, reducing overall complexity while maintaining complete operational capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a large horizontal chain ring mechanism, the invention introduces a compact oscillating element that operates in a different dimensional space, requiring minimal horizontal clearance and simplifying installation while achieving the same functional result of overcoming the dead point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If a chain ring mechanism is used, then the door can overcome the dead point, but the risk of user injury from crushing or entrapment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedead point overcoming capabilityVSAvoiduser safety risk from moving parts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The dangerous chain ring mechanism is completely removed from the system. Instead, a safe oscillating element is used that cannot crush or entrap users, while still providing the necessary function of overcoming the dead point through gentle horizontal positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts the potentially harmful large-scale moving chain mechanism into a benign oscillating element that operates with minimal force and clearance, transforming a safety hazard into a safe and reliable solution for dead point overcoming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Ease of operation

If a sprocket and rack system is used, then the door can be opened and closed, but the rack requires frequent cleaning to avoid jamming and the sprocket has high risk of being crushed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor opening/closing functionVSAvoidmaintenance requirements and safety concerns
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The problematic sprocket and rack system is completely removed. The invention replaces it with an oscillating element that directly positions the door horizontally without requiring meshing components, thereby eliminating jamming issues and crushing risks while maintaining full operational capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Adaptability or versatility

If an extensible bracket is used with chain mechanism, then the bracket can accommodate door tilting, but the closure safety cannot be ensured as the bracket may detach

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebracket adaptability to door positionVSAvoidsafe closure guarantee
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The extensible bracket mechanism is removed entirely. The invention uses a simple oscillating element that provides stable horizontal positioning without requiring extensible or detachable components, ensuring reliable and safe door closure at all times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a compact, cost-effective, and reliable opening/closing mechanism with reduced risk of mechanical failure and user safety hazards, efficient power usage, and easy installation, ensuring safe and complete operation of overhead doors.

Implementation Method 1

overcoming friction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP2960420B1Device to open/close garage doors
Publication Date: 2020.10.14 SERRANDE DE NARDI -
  • EP2960420B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2960420B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2960420B1 patent drawingFigure 5~8

AI summary

A device is described which is adapted to open/close and/or lock a overhead canopy door (10) used to occlude an aperture (12). The device comprises an element (40) adapted to move only slightly the door, with respect to the vertical, by imparting to it a force on its upper edge (20) by angularly oscillating around an axis (X). Such a device simplifies the displacement of the door and the associated costs.