Oscillating Loop Detection in Formal Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electronic design verification techniques struggle to distinguish between stable and oscillating combinational loops, leading to incorrect analysis and potential functional, power, and manufacturing issues, as they cannot handle circuits with loops effectively using formal verification.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for electronic design verification that involves receiving an electronic design with loops, removing sections, generating copies, and analyzing loop output nets using formal verification, with the ability to detect oscillating loops by checking for specific miter values and inverting I/O values to differentiate between loop types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If formal verification is applied to electronic designs with combinational loops, then verification coverage is improved, but analysis accuracy deteriorates due to inability to distinguish between stable and oscillating loops

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification coverageVSAvoidanalysis accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is segmented into multiple analysis passes: initial formal verification to identify loops, followed by classification of loops as stable or oscillating, and finally targeted re-verification. This segmentation allows comprehensive coverage while maintaining accuracy by treating different loop types appropriately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary classification mechanism is introduced between formal verification and final analysis. The system uses loop detection and classification as an intermediate step that processes the output of formal verification and provides refined information for accurate analysis, enabling distinction between stable and oscillating loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If loop detection and classification mechanisms are added to distinguish stable and oscillating loops, then analysis accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloop classification accuracyVSAvoidverification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification system is divided into modular components: loop detection module, loop classification module, and re-verification module. Each module performs a specific function, making the overall complex system manageable and maintainable while achieving accurate loop classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The verification system performs self-analysis by automatically detecting loops, classifying them as stable or oscillating, and adjusting verification strategies without external intervention. This self-service capability reduces the need for manual configuration and simplifies usage despite the underlying complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If sections of loops are removed and design copies are generated for analysis, then oscillating loop detection capability is improved, but computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoscillating loop detection reliabilityVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of analyzing complete loop structures, the system applies partial action by removing specific sections of loops and analyzing only the critical portions. This reduces computational resources while maintaining reliable detection of oscillating loops through targeted analysis of loop cut inputs and outputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system generates simplified copies of the electronic design with loop sections removed, rather than analyzing the complete original design multiple times. These copies require fewer computational resources while preserving the essential characteristics needed for reliable oscillating loop detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10176286B1System, method, and computer program product for oscillating loop detection in formal verification
Publication Date: 2019.01.08 CADENCE DESIGN SYST INC
  • US10176286B1 patent drawing
  • US10176286B1 patent drawing
  • US10176286B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a computer-implemented method for electronic design verification. The method may include receiving, using a processor, an electronic design having a plurality of loops and removing a section of each of the plurality of loops. The method may further include obtaining an input/output net for each of the plurality of loops and generating a copy of at least a portion of the electronic design. The method may include connecting all inputs except a loop cut input net associated with the removed section and analyzing a loop output net using formal verification.