Oscillating Rake Weed Control System for Ponds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling weeds in bodies of water, such as lakes and ponds, are either labor-intensive or environmentally unsatisfactory, with manual removal being inefficient and chemical treatments posing environmental concerns, while bulky mechanical harvesters are impractical for private use.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight, oscillating weed control system featuring a rotatable vertically oriented shaft, an elongate horizontally oriented support member, and a rake suspended by a flexible line, driven by a small oscillating motor, which moves in a repeating pattern to cut weeds without the need for water resistance, allowing for efficient weed removal with minimal environmental impact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual weed removal using rakes or tools is used, then labor intensity is high, but the system complexity remains low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabor intensityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the support member rotatable about the vertical shaft, transforming a static manual rake into a dynamic automated system. The oscillating motor rotates the support member back and forth, causing the rake to move through the water automatically, thereby reducing labor intensity while maintaining manageable system complexity through a simple rotational mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by using the oscillating motor to automatically move the rake through the water without requiring manual operation. Once deployed, the motor-driven mechanism autonomously performs the weed removal function, eliminating the need for continuous human labor while keeping the overall system structure relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If bulky mechanical weed harvesters are used, then weed removal capability is improved, but portability and practicality for private use deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed removal capabilityVSAvoidportability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the weed harvester into distinct functional components: a vertical shaft mounted to the dock, a horizontally extending support member, and a rake suspended from the support member. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and enables the entire system to be compact and portable while maintaining effective weed removal capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from the conventional horizontal movement of bulk harvesters to a vertical mounting configuration where the shaft is mounted to the dock and the support member extends horizontally from it. This dimensional reorganization allows the system to achieve weed removal effectiveness in a compact, vertically-oriented package that is much more portable and suitable for private use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If chemical treatments are used, then environmental impact is worsened, but weed control effectiveness is improved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed control effectivenessVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces chemical treatment methods with a mechanical system consisting of an oscillating motor, support member, and rake. This mechanical approach physically removes weeds through controlled oscillation and rake contact, achieving effective weed control without introducing harmful chemicals into the water environment, thus eliminating the environmental impact associated with chemical treatments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of manufacture

If a rotatable support member system is used, then portability and ease of installation are improved, but the complexity of the oscillating mechanism increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of installationVSAvoidoscillating mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the oscillating motor as a separate, self-contained component that drives the support member rotation. By isolating the oscillating function to a dedicated motor unit, the overall system becomes easier to manufacture and install, as the motor can be independently selected and replaced without affecting other components, while the rotational mechanism itself remains relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12063887B2Method and system for controlling weeds
Publication Date: 2024.08.20 LAKE RESTORATION
  • US12063887B2 patent drawing
  • US12063887B2 patent drawing
  • US12063887B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A weed control system for a body of water can include a rotatable vertically oriented shaft mounted proximate the body of water; an elongate horizontally oriented support member mounted to the vertically oriented shaft and suspended over the water; a rake suspended from the support member by a flexible line; and an oscillating motor for rotating the vertically oriented shaft and the elongate support member such that the rake moves in a repeating pattern through the body of water.