Watch Oscillator Assembly Using Predicted Spring Stiffness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for assembling watch oscillators are complex, costly, and require time-consuming stiffness measurements for each elastic restoring element to ensure the desired frequency, lacking simplicity and reliability.

Innovation Solution

A method involving lithography and machining to create a stiffness classification system on a reference wafer, measuring a subset of elastic restoring elements, predicting the stiffness of unmeasured elements, and pairing them with inertial elements to achieve the desired oscillation frequency, using vibratory excitation and laser vibrometry for non-contact measurement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If stiffness measurements are performed on each elastic restoring element, then frequency accuracy is ensured, but assembly time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestiffness measurement accuracyVSAvoidassembly speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial measurement by measuring stiffness of only a subset of elastic restoring elements (e.g., one per batch) rather than each individual element. This partial action achieves sufficient frequency control while dramatically reducing measurement time and assembly complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary classification by pre-grouping elastic restoring elements into stiffness categories before assembly. This preliminary action allows faster matching with inertial elements during assembly, eliminating the need for individual measurements while ensuring frequency accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If stiffness measurements are performed on each elastic restoring element, then frequency control is ensured, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency control accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces manufacturing cost by performing stiffness measurements on only a partial subset of elastic restoring elements rather than each element. This partial measurement approach maintains frequency control accuracy while significantly lowering measurement and assembly costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses stiffness measurements from measured elements as proxies or copies to represent unmeasured elements within the same batch. This copying approach allows frequency control without direct measurement of each element, reducing manufacturing overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If all elastic restoring elements are measured for stiffness, then classification accuracy is improved, but measurement time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestiffness classification accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves sufficient classification accuracy by measuring only a partial subset of elastic restoring elements. The measured elements provide enough statistical information to classify the entire batch, eliminating the time-consuming measurement of every element while maintaining classification reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary stiffness measurements on a subset of elements to establish classification criteria before assembling the remaining unmeasured elements. This preliminary action creates a reference framework that enables accurate classification without measuring every element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables faster, less expensive, and more reliable assembly of watch oscillators with accurate frequency control by reducing the need for extensive stiffness measurements, ensuring precise classification and coupling of elastic restoring elements.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic restoring element (for example, a balance spring), and in particular, the present invention relates to a method of assembling a watch oscillator in which a stiffness of the elastic restoring element is predicted or deduced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

an inertial element (for example, a balance wheel) and an elastic restoring element (for example, a balance spring)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Data Source

PatentEP4711862A1Method for assembling a clock oscillator
Publication Date: 2026.03.18 RICHEMONT INTERNATIONAL SA
  • EP4711862A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4711862A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4711862A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for assembling a clock oscillator, comprising at least the steps of: - (S1) manufacturing a plurality of elastic return springs (20) in a reference plate (100), - (S2) measuring at least one stiffness of at least one elastic return spring (20) and at least one stiffness of at most a predetermined quantity of the elastic return springs (20) manufactured in the reference plate (100), - (S3) deducing a stiffness of at least some of the unmeasured elastic return springs (20) from the reference plate (100), - (S4) performing a stiffness ranking of the manufactured unmeasured elastic return springs (20) and/or providing a pairing of the unmeasured elastic return springs (20) with an inertial element (10) of suitable inertia, to allow each manufactured elastic return spring (20) to be assembled with an inertial element (10).