Osmotic Reaction Cell for Low-Concentration Binding Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for monitoring reactivity in biological and non-biological reactions, especially at low concentrations, are limited by the inability to detect small osmotic pressure changes and require tagged molecules or specific preparations, making it difficult to test large numbers of samples efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A method and system using osmotic reaction cells with semi-permeable membranes to measure changes in osmotic pressure between two wells, allowing for the detection of low concentration reactions by monitoring changes in osmotic pressure, enabling the measurement of binding and catalytic reactions at concentrations as low as 10−6 to 10−7 M.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If nanocalorimetry is used to monitor reactions, then fast reactions producing sufficient heat can be detected, but slow or weak reactions that do not produce detectable heat cannot be monitored

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidreaction type coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the measurement parameter from heat production (nanocalorimetry) to osmotic pressure changes. By monitoring osmotic pressure instead of thermal effects, the system can detect both fast and slow reactions, as well as weak reactions that do not produce sufficient heat, thereby expanding reaction type coverage while maintaining detection sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the thermal measurement system (nanocalorimetry) with an osmotic pressure measurement system. This substitution allows detection of reactions that do not produce detectable heat, including slow and weak reactions, while maintaining the ability to monitor fast reactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If fluorescent tags are attached to candidate compounds for reaction testing, then reactions can be detected, but the testing process becomes cumbersome and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction detection capabilityVSAvoidtesting throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the detection mechanism from the candidate compounds themselves. Instead of requiring fluorescent tags attached to each compound, the system uses osmotic pressure changes of the reaction mixture as the detection signal. This eliminates the tagging step entirely, making the process simpler and enabling high-throughput screening of large numbers of samples.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The reaction mixture itself provides the detection signal through osmotic pressure changes. The system uses the inherent colligative properties of the reaction components rather than requiring external tags or labels. This self-service approach eliminates cumbersome preparation steps and enables efficient testing of large sample numbers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If high concentrations are used in osmotic pressure measurements, then osmotic pressure changes are detectable, but the selectivity of reactions decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveosmotic pressure detectionVSAvoidreaction selectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enhances detection sensitivity by using a differential measurement approach with a reference well. By comparing the osmotic pressure change in the reaction well against a reference well containing only carrier fluid, the system can detect small concentration changes at low sample concentrations without compromising reaction selectivity. This dimensional approach (comparative measurement) enables both sensitivity and selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient monitoring of reactivity at low concentrations, allowing for the testing of large numbers of samples without the need for tagged molecules or immobilization, thereby reducing costs and increasing the selectivity of reactions.

Implementation Method 1

a semi-permeable membrane separating the first and second wells

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOsmosis: Osmosis

Implementation Method 2

monitoring a change in an osmotic pressure in said osmotic reaction cell occurring as a result of a change in concentration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOsmotic pressure: Osmotic Pressure

Data Source

PatentUS7615375B2Osmotic reaction cell for monitoring biological and non-biological reactions
Publication Date: 2009.11.10 GENESEE VALLEY INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US7615375B2 patent drawing
  • US7615375B2 patent drawing
  • US7615375B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for measuring the presence or absence of reaction between a first and second material of interest by measuring osmotic pressure changes in a reaction cell. The reaction cell is capable of measuring the small changes in pressure that occur due to osmotic pressure shifts during a catalytic or binding reaction at species concentrations down to approximately 10−7 M.