Open Source Software Threat Detection via ML Execution Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Open source software (OSS) components pose a significant threat due to their widespread use and potential for cyber-weaponization, as they often lack visibility into their behavior, making it difficult for traditional security methods to detect covert or malicious actions.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a trained machine learning model, specifically a neural network, to process data from instrumented OSS components, providing real-time threat intelligence to identify potential threat behaviors and alert security personnel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If traditional security methods are used to monitor OSS components, then security coverage is maintained, but detection capability for covert or malicious actions is insufficient due to lack of visibility into OSS behavior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidvisibility into OSS behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary instrumentation layer between the OSS components and the security monitoring system. This intermediary captures execution data (routines called, memory settings, execution order, exceptions) from OSS components and translates it into a format suitable for ML analysis, enabling detection of covert behaviors without modifying the OSS components themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical security monitoring approaches with a machine learning-based system. Instead of relying on rule-based detection or manual analysis of OSS behavior, the system uses trained ML models to process execution data and identify threat patterns, significantly improving detection capability for unknown or covert malicious actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If instrumentation tools are added to monitor OSS components, then visibility into execution behavior is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisibility into execution behaviorVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential execution data needed for security monitoring from the complex OSS component behavior. The instrumentation tool captures specific parameters (routines called, memory settings, execution order, exceptions) rather than attempting to monitor all possible system states, reducing the complexity burden while maintaining necessary visibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The instrumentation tools are designed to be lightweight and automatically integrate with OSS components without requiring significant manual configuration or complex system modifications. The system self-configures by capturing execution data as it naturally occurs, minimizing the complexity overhead introduced by monitoring infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If machine learning models are used to analyze OSS execution data, then threat detection accuracy is improved, but computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-training machine learning models on historical execution data and threat patterns before actual threat detection is needed. The models are trained in advance to recognize normal versus malicious behavior patterns, so that during runtime, the system only needs to infer predictions from new execution data without performing complex training computations, significantly reducing real-time computational resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250200179A1Open source software behavioral visibility and threat intelligence
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 LOUISIANA TECH RESEARCH CORP OF LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • US20250200179A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200179A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200179A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to detecting threats relating to open source software components. In accordance with one aspect, a method includes accessing data regarding execution of at least one open source software (OSS) component of an application, processing the data by a trained machine learning (ML) model where the trained ML model provides an indication of whether the at least one OSS component exhibits normal behavior or exhibits potential threat behavior, and communicating the indication.