Anatomic Osteochondral Implant via Additive Mold Fabrication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis treatments often fail in the long term, leading to the need for destructive surgical interventions that compromise grip strength and result in subsidence and disfigurement, as conservative methods are insufficient in providing durable and anatomically correct replacements for damaged bone and cartilage.

Innovation Solution

A method for forming a prosthesis comprising a bone-like portion and a cartilage-like portion using additive manufacturing, where three-dimensional models of the bone and cartilage are created from medical images, and negative molds are formed to produce anatomically shaped osteochondral constructs that mimic natural bone and cartilage, allowing for integration and ingrowth, and are seeded with stem cells for tissue regeneration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional destructive surgical intervention is used to replace damaged bone and cartilage, then pain is reduced, but grip strength is compromised and disfigurement occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepain reductionVSAvoidgrip strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the fundamental parameter of implant material composition by using patient-specific stem cells to generate living bone and cartilage tissue, replacing traditional inert materials. This biological approach allows the implant to integrate with and strengthen the patient's existing anatomy over time, potentially improving grip strength while reducing pain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite biological structure by combining patient-derived stem cells with a scaffold system that mimics natural osteochondral architecture. This composite approach enables the implant to function as both structural support and living tissue, addressing both pain relief and strength preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional surgical intervention is used to replace damaged joint structures, then pain is relieved, but anatomical accuracy and function are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepain reliefVSAvoidanatomical accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates an exact anatomical copy of the patient's original joint structures by using 3D imaging and modeling to replicate the unique geometry of their bone and cartilage. This custom-designed implant preserves the patient's natural anatomical shape and function while relieving pain, avoiding the disfigurement and functional compromise of standardized implants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies different material properties and cellular compositions to different regions of the implant to match the specific requirements of bone and cartilage tissues. The osteochondral interface is engineered with distinct zones that replicate the natural transition from bone to cartilage, ensuring anatomical accuracy and proper joint function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If conservative treatments are used for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis, then grip strength is maintained, but long-term effectiveness is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrip strengthVSAvoidlong-term effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention enables the implant to self-repair and self-strengthen by using the patient's own stem cells that continuously generate new bone and cartilage tissue. This living implant adapts and improves over time, providing long-term effectiveness while maintaining grip strength, unlike conservative treatments that eventually fail or traditional implants that do not regenerate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11633879B2Anatomic tissue-engineered osteochondral implant and method for fabrication thereof
Publication Date: 2023.04.25 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
  • US11633879B2 patent drawing
  • US11633879B2 patent drawing
  • US11633879B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for forming a prosthesis comprising a bone-like portion and a cartilage-like portion can comprise additively manufacturing a first positive mold in accordance with a portion of a first three-dimensional model of a portion of a bone. A first negative mold can be formed from the first positive mold. The bone-like portion can be created within the first negative mold. A second positive mold of the bone and a cartilage can be additively manufactured from a second three-dimensional model. A portion of the second three-dimensional model can correspond to a portion of the first three-dimensional model. A second negative mold can be formed from the second positive mold. The bone-like portion can be positioned in the second negative mold so that the second negative mold and the bone-like portion can define a cartilage space that can be filled with a material to form the cartilage-like portion of the prosthesis.