OT Network Anomaly Monitoring With Multi-Modal Sensor Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing OT monitoring systems fail to effectively detect sophisticated cyber-physical threats due to limitations in sensor coverage, computational overhead, and adaptability, leading to vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing multi-modal sensor nodes with dynamic time warping and a ConvGLSTM neural network for spatiotemporal anomaly detection, integrated with edge computing and cloud analytics, provides comprehensive environmental sensing and intelligent analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional network-based intrusion detection systems are used to monitor communication patterns, then network security monitoring is provided, but attacks exploiting legitimate protocols or occurring through non-network vectors are missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines multiple monitoring approaches (network-based, host-based, and physical process monitoring) into a unified multi-modal framework that can detect diverse attack vectors including network-based attacks, physical tampering, and manipulations of the physical process itself, making the system versatile against different attack types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If host-based monitoring agents are installed on legacy OT systems, then comprehensive system monitoring is achieved, but system stability is compromised and real-time control loop timing precision is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring comprehensivenessVSAvoidreal-time response speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts features locally from multi-modal data streams (network packets, sensor readings, control commands) and performs lightweight anomaly detection at the edge, reserving only essential processing for the OT devices while maintaining real-time performance requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer that collects and analyzes data from multiple sources without requiring direct installation on legacy OT systems, using passive monitoring and existing data interfaces to avoid interfering with real-time control loops

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If SCADA systems monitor only critical process variables, then real-time control monitoring is maintained, but subtle indicators of compromise are missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time control responseVSAvoidanomaly detection sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors all available process variables and sensor data beyond just the critical control variables, performing comprehensive analysis to detect subtle anomalies, while focusing computational resources on the most relevant indicators for real-time response

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Use of energy by moving object

If traditional industrial sensors with sampling rates of 1 to 10 Hz are used, then power consumption and computational load are kept low, but high-frequency anomalies indicative of certain attack types cannot be captured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor power consumptionVSAvoidanomaly detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts sampling rates based on the monitored asset type, operational context, and detected anomaly levels, using higher sampling rates for critical assets or when anomalies are detected and lower rates during normal operation to balance detection precision with power consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

5Measurement precision

If supervised learning methods are used for anomaly detection, then detection accuracy is improved, but labeled attack data scarcity and inability to represent future attack variations remain issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidattack pattern coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges supervised learning (trained on known attack patterns) with unsupervised learning (detecting novel anomalies through pattern deviation) to achieve both high detection accuracy for known threats and adaptability to future attack variations through anomaly-based detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

6Adaptability or versatility

If unsupervised machine learning methods are used for anomaly detection, then adaptability to novel attacks is improved, but excessive false positives are generated leading to alert fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenovel attack detectionVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from multi-modal data correlation and anomaly scoring to distinguish true positives from false positives, adjusting detection thresholds and models based on operational context and historical data to reduce alert fatigue while maintaining adaptability to novel attacks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260064854A1Adaptive monitoring of operational technology networks
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 TAUTUK INC
  • US20260064854A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064854A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064854A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments include systems and methods for adaptive monitoring of operational technology networks. In some embodiments, the method includes collecting multi-modal time series data from a plurality of wireless sensor nodes deployed near at least one operational technology asset, aligning and fusing the time series data using dynamic time warping, extracting at least one feature and at least one dependency from the fused time series data, generating, based on the extracted feature and dependency, a real-time anomaly score using a trained machine learning model, determining, based on the real-time anomaly score, at least one anomaly regarding the operational technology asset, and presenting a visualization of the anomaly at an interactive user interface.