OT Security Analysis Using Adaptive Attack Detection Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing complexity and variability of operational technology (OT) systems pose challenges for effective security analysis and monitoring, particularly due to the integration of Information Technology (IT) networks, which makes them vulnerable to sophisticated security threats and novel attack methods.

Innovation Solution

An analysis device and system for OT systems that extracts features from security logs and network traffic, generates an algorithm model to identify abnormal behaviors, and integrates human intelligence with artificial intelligence for enhanced intrusion detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional security monitoring methods are used in OT systems, then the system maintains simplicity and closed architecture, but the system becomes vulnerable to sophisticated security threats and novel attack methods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protection capabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the security analysis process into multiple independent modules: data collection module, feature extraction module, behavior analysis module, and algorithm model generation module. Each module handles specific tasks, allowing the complex security monitoring function to be built from simpler, manageable components that can be independently developed and maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic algorithm models that continuously adapt to new attack patterns. The system automatically generates updated algorithm models based on analyzed attack behaviors, transforming the static security monitoring system into a dynamic one that evolves with emerging threats, thereby improving reliability without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive security analysis is performed on complex OT systems, then the detection capability for known and novel attacks is improved, but the analysis time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattack behavior detection accuracyVSAvoidsecurity analysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary feature extraction from collected data, identifying key characteristics and patterns before conducting full security analysis. By pre-processing data and extracting relevant features in advance, the system reduces the computational burden during actual attack detection, maintaining high accuracy while reducing analysis time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts analysis parameters and algorithms based on the specific context and type of security event detected. The system selects and configures appropriate algorithm models according to the analyzed attack behavior, optimizing the balance between detection accuracy and analysis speed for different threat scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If static algorithm models are used for intrusion detection, then the system is easy to implement and maintain, but the system cannot effectively identify novel attack behaviors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of novel attack behaviorsVSAvoidalgorithm model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system continuously analyzes detected attack behaviors and uses this information to automatically generate updated algorithm models. The analysis results feed back into the model generation process, creating a closed-loop system that continuously improves its detection capabilities against novel attacks without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-updating of algorithm models based on analyzed attack patterns. Rather than requiring external experts to manually create and update detection models, the system automatically generates updated models from its own analysis data, reducing the complexity burden on operators while maintaining high adaptability to new threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3776306B1Analysis device, method and system for operational technology system and storage medium
Publication Date: 2026.01.14 SIEMENS AG
  • EP3776306B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3776306B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3776306B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An analysis device (10), method and system for an operational technology system and a storage medium, relate to the technical field of industrial networks and information security. The device comprises a parsing module (101) configured to acquire first data related to the operational technology system from a data storage area, and parse out first features of the first data; an identifying module (102) configured to identify an abnormal feature from the first features; and a model generation module (103) configured to acquire second data related to the abnormal feature from the data storage area, and generate an algorithm model based on the second data, where the algorithm model is used for identifying an attack behavior related to the abnormal feature. The attack behavior can be automatically identified, and complementation of the advantages of human intelligence and the advantages of artificial intelligence is realized.