OT Control Security Gateway for Blocking Malicious Commands

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Control systems in operational technology (OT) networks are vulnerable to cyber threats due to lack of inherent security measures, with existing IT security solutions inadequate for protecting Levels 0-2 processes, and there is a need for specific protections against attacks that can degrade production, cause equipment damage, or pose safety issues.

Innovation Solution

A security device is introduced to monitor and block undesirable control commands, authenticate maintenance requests, and store forensic data, utilizing AI for anomaly detection and integrating with OT systems to ensure data validation and consistency, providing enhanced security functions tailored for OT networks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional control systems are interconnected to communication networks for automation and process efficiency, then productivity and process efficiency are improved, but vulnerability to cyber security threats increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess efficiencyVSAvoidcyber security threats
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A security device is introduced as an intermediary component between control devices and communication networks. The security device monitors, analyzes, and controls communications to block malicious commands while allowing legitimate control signals to pass through, thus resolving the contradiction by adding a protective layer that enables network connectivity without exposing the control system to cyber threats

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is segmented into protected zones with the security device forming a boundary layer. Control devices remain isolated in secure zones while the security device interfaces with external networks, allowing productivity benefits of connectivity while containing cyber security risks within specific network segments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If IT security solutions such as firewalls and virus protection are applied to OT networks, then some attack apertures are reduced, but they fail to address specific vulnerabilities of OT networks designed for process efficiency and safety

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protectionVSAvoidsuitability for OT networks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The security device implements security functions specifically tailored to OT network characteristics and requirements. Rather than applying generic IT security solutions, the device is configured with OT-specific protocols, safety considerations, and process efficiency requirements, making it adaptable to the unique qualities of operational technology environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The security device adjusts security parameters dynamically based on OT network conditions, device types, and communication patterns. It modifies security behavior to accommodate different OT protocols and safety requirements, transforming the rigid IT security approach into a flexible solution suited for OT networks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the security device monitors and analyzes all control communications in real-time to detect malicious commands, then security detection capability is improved, but processing time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The security device performs preliminary actions by establishing baseline normal behavior patterns for control communications before actual monitoring begins. By pre-configuring expected communication patterns, device identities, and legitimate command structures, the device can quickly compare real-time traffic against these pre-established criteria, improving detection accuracy without requiring extensive real-time analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The security device applies partial monitoring by focusing analysis on specific high-risk communication patterns and protocols rather than uniformly analyzing all traffic. It selectively intensifies monitoring for suspicious patterns while allowing normal traffic to pass with minimal processing, thus maintaining high detection precision for critical threats while reducing overall processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12549519B2Security system, device, and method for protecting control systems
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 SERVICENOW INC
  • US12549519B2 patent drawing
  • US12549519B2 patent drawing
  • US12549519B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A protection system, method, and a security device can protect an operational technology (OT) system having connected hardware equipment, including at least an interface that can receive a control communication and an industrial control device (ICD) for controlling at least one industrial device. They feature tasks/steps that receive control communication from the communication interface, determine whether the received control communication contains an undesirable control command, and either pass or block the received control communication to the ICD depending on whether the received control communication contains an undesirable control command. The security device can be disposed between a source of communication in an OT network and the ICD for protection.