Out-of-Order Accelerator Invocation With Register-Based Results

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Central Processing Units (CPUs) face inefficiencies due to their sequential programming model, which limits parallelism and requires high control overhead, making it challenging to scale compute and memory throughput, and conventional accelerator communication methods restrict out-of-order execution and control over tasks, leading to serialized and speculative limitations.

Innovation Solution

Implementing near-core accelerators (NCAs) that are directly controlled by the CPU core, using accelerator task instructions that execute speculatively and out-of-order, with results stored in CPU registers, allowing tighter control over task execution and enabling micro-threaded operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional accelerator communication methods are used, then data movement overhead is reduced, but out-of-order execution is restricted and task control is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution throughputVSAvoidcontrol overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the accelerator invocation mechanism with the CPU's existing out-of-order execution infrastructure. Accelerator tasks are integrated into the instruction stream and processed by the same reorder buffer, reservation stations, and execution units that handle regular CPU instructions, enabling seamless out-of-order execution without requiring separate control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the CPU core's execution infrastructure universal by enabling it to handle both regular CPU instructions and accelerator invocation instructions through the same pipeline stages. The reorder buffer, reservation stations, and execution units are designed to process mixed instruction types uniformly, eliminating the need for separate handling paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If sequential programming model is used, then control overhead is reduced, but parallelism is limited and scalability is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompute throughputVSAvoidcontrol structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic parallelism by allowing accelerator tasks to be issued speculatively and out-of-order based on runtime conditions. The system dynamically determines execution order and timing rather than following a fixed sequential pattern, enabling the CPU to exploit parallelism opportunities as they arise during execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables speculative execution of accelerator tasks before their results are needed by subsequent instructions. The reorder buffer holds speculative accelerator invocations and resolves dependencies later, allowing the system to begin accelerator work in advance rather than waiting for sequential completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If accelerator tasks are executed in-order, then control simplicity is maintained, but execution efficiency and parallelism are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution efficiencyVSAvoidexecution control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables accelerator tasks to self-manage their execution timing and ordering through the CPU's existing out-of-order infrastructure. Each accelerator invocation instruction automatically interacts with the reorder buffer, reservation stations, and execution units to determine its optimal execution time, eliminating the need for explicit ordering control by software.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If speculative execution is disabled, then control overhead is reduced, but performance and parallelism are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveperformanceVSAvoidexecution control mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through the reorder buffer and dependency tracking infrastructure that monitor execution progress and resolve speculative decisions. When speculative accelerator tasks are issued, the system tracks their dependencies and outcomes, using this feedback to determine commit order and handle mispredictions, enabling performance gains without requiring complex external control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260023569A1Speculative invocation of accelerators in out-of-order pipelines
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 INTEL CORP
  • US20260023569A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023569A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023569A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for speculative invocation of accelerators in out-of-order pipelines are described. In some examples, a processor core at least comprising: decoder circuitry to at least decode an accelerator task instruction, scheduling circuitry to at least schedule the decoded accelerator task instruction to execute on an accelerator, a port coupled to the accelerator, and at least one register to store a result of the decoded accelerator task instruction; is coupled to the accelerator to execute the decoded accelerator task instruction and provide the result to the processor core through the port coupled to the accelerator.