Outage Risk Detection via Event Aggregation and Threshold Alerts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organizations face challenges in determining whether intermittent performance issues with third-party computer services indicate an imminent operation outage, due to the complexity and noise in monitoring systems.

Innovation Solution

An outage risk detection system that ingests events from multiple organizations, rejects events not meeting a predetermined acceptance rate, identifies services with current incidents requiring human interaction, aggregates incident counts across time windows, and generates alerts when the aggregate count surpasses a threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system monitors all events from multiple organizations, then the detection coverage is improved, but the false positive rate increases due to common intermittent issues that do not indicate actual outages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutage detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse positives
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating between types of events based on their characteristics. It specifically identifies events requiring human interaction versus those that can be automatically resolved, and applies different monitoring thresholds and alerting behaviors to each category. This selective approach improves detection accuracy for critical outages while filtering out noise from routine intermittent issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-classifying events into categories based on historical data and event characteristics before they trigger alerts. By预先 identifying which event types are indicative of actual outages versus routine issues, the system prepares filtering rules in advance that reduce false positives when monitoring ongoing events across multiple organizations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the system aggregates incident counts across multiple organizations and time windows, then the reliability of outage risk detection is improved, but the complexity of the monitoring system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutage risk detection accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the monitoring system into distinct functional components: event ingestion modules, event classification modules, aggregation modules with time window management, and alert generation modules. This modular architecture manages complexity by organizing functions into separate, manageable segments that can be independently configured and maintained while achieving reliable multi-organization monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces another dimension by adding time window aggregation to the monitoring approach. Instead of simply counting incidents across organizations, it aggregates data across multiple time dimensions (e.g., rolling windows, fixed intervals), creating a multi-dimensional view of incident patterns that improves detection reliability without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Loss of time

If the system processes and analyzes events in real-time, then the response time to detected outages is improved, but the computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutage detection timeVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively processing only those events that meet predefined criteria for potential outages. Rather than analyzing every event in detail, the system performs lightweight filtering to identify candidate events, then applies more intensive analysis only to those that exhibit characteristics of actual outages. This reduces overall computational resource consumption while maintaining real-time detection capability for critical issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250045670A1Outage Risk Detection Alerts
Publication Date: 2025.02.06 PAGERDUTY INC
  • US20250045670A1 patent drawing
  • US20250045670A1 patent drawing
  • US20250045670A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An outage risk detection system ingests events. Each event indicates a condition detected by a monitoring tool within a computing environment. Events that do not meet a pre-determined acceptance rate are rejected by the system. The system monitors the ingested events to identify computer services experiencing incidents. The identified computer services are such that they historically require human intervention to resolve. The system aggregates a count of organizations experiencing service incidents for a particular computer service across multiple time windows. The system generates an outage risk detection alert when the aggregated count surpasses a specified threshold level.