Outboard Motor Engine Cover Segmentation for Shape Flexibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing engine covers for outboard motors, with large integrated top cowls or portions, face limitations in shape flexibility and material restrictions due to their design, making it difficult to effectively reduce shape restrictions and enhance sealability and rigidity.

Innovation Solution

The engine cover is divided into two overlapping pieces with uniform connections and an adhesive layer for bonding, along with flanges for increased rigidity and sealability, and a bolt for additional strength, allowing for improved shape flexibility and reduced size differences while maintaining robustness and waterproofness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If the top cowl is divided into parts to increase shape freedom, then the degree of freedom of shape increases, but it becomes impossible to effectively reduce all parts and lighten restrictions imposed on shapes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape freedomVSAvoidnumber of parts
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The top cowl is divided into a first top cowl and a second top cowl, which are disposed on opposite sides of the engine in the width direction. This segmentation allows each cowl to be independently designed and manufactured, increasing shape freedom while keeping the number of parts manageable. The division line extends from the front end to the rear end of the engine, creating two symmetrical or near-symmetrical portions that can be efficiently produced.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first and second top cowls are positioned asymmetrically relative to the engine layout, with each cowl covering different portions of the engine. This asymmetric arrangement allows optimization of each cowl's shape for its specific location, improving overall shape freedom while maintaining functional requirements for engine coverage and access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Ease of manufacture

If a single integrated top cowl is used, then manufacturing is simpler, but restrictions on shape and material are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidshape restriction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the top cowl into two separate cowls, each portion can be manufactured using optimal materials and processes for its specific requirements. This segmentation enables the use of different materials for different portions if needed, while still maintaining relatively simple manufacturing for each individual cowl piece.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each top cowl portion can be designed with local optimizations specific to its position and function. For example, different portions may use different materials or structural features suited to their specific operational requirements, such as areas requiring higher strength versus areas requiring weight reduction or aesthetic considerations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If the top cowl is divided at positions that do not overlap the engine in plan view, then assembly is simpler, but size difference between parts increases and shape restrictions are not effectively reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidsize difference
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The top cowl is segmented into two portions that overlap the engine in plan view, with the division line extending from front to rear. This creates two smaller, more manageable parts with reduced size differences, while the overlapping arrangement ensures proper positioning and alignment during assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The division line of the top cowl is arranged to extend in the front-rear direction (longitudinal dimension) rather than the width direction. This dimensional orientation creates two portions of more similar size and allows both portions to overlap the engine in plan view, achieving better size balance while maintaining assembly simplicity through the linear division pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the shape flexibility, sealability, and rigidity of the engine cover, reducing shape restrictions and size differences, while improving the waterproofness and robustness by using an adhesive layer and bolts for secure bonding.

Implementation Method 1

an adhesive layer that bonds the two connections together

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS11760458B2Outboard motor engine cover and outboard motor
Publication Date: 2023.09.19 YAMAHA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11760458B2 patent drawing
  • US11760458B2 patent drawing
  • US11760458B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An outboard motor includes an engine to rotate a propeller and an engine cover that houses the engine. The engine cover includes two divided covers disposed above the engine and that directly face the engine. The two divided covers include two connections that are connected together and that overlap the engine in a plan view.