Outboard Motor Upper Engine Cover Rigidity and Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing outboard motors face challenges in miniaturization, rigidity, and weight reduction, particularly with large-sized engines, which lead to noise and difficulty in attaching/detaching engine covers due to insufficient rigidity and increased weight.

Innovation Solution

The outboard motor design includes an inclined oil filter and a lower-mounted electric actuator with a link mechanism, reducing the width and weight of the upper engine cover while maintaining rigidity, and optimizing the mating position between engine covers to prevent interference during maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the thickness of the upper engine cover is increased to ensure rigidity, then the rigidity is improved, but the weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverigidityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces reinforcing ribs that extend in the width direction (lateral dimension) rather than simply increasing thickness in the vertical dimension. These ribs create a three-dimensional reinforcing structure that boosts rigidity through geometric configuration rather than material volume, thereby improving stiffness without proportionally increasing weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcing ribs are strategically positioned at specific locations on the upper engine cover where structural support is most needed. This localized reinforcement approach concentrates material only where necessary to achieve the required rigidity, avoiding uniform thickness increases across the entire cover and thus minimizing unnecessary weight gain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Area of stationary object

If the size of the upper engine cover is increased to cover the entire periphery of the engine, then the coverage is improved, but the rigidity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidrigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds reinforcing ribs that extend in the width direction across the large surface area of the upper engine cover. These ribs create a three-dimensional reinforcing structure that divides the large flat area into smaller rigid sections, preventing deformation across the entire periphery while maintaining comprehensive engine coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Area of stationary object

If the upper engine cover is made large-sized to cover the entire periphery, then the coverage is improved, but the workability of attaching and detaching decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidworkability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces reinforcing ribs that create natural hand-holding positions and structural divisions on the large upper engine cover. These ribs provide tactile reference points and structural edges that make it easier for operators to grip and maneuver the large cover during attachment and detachment operations, improving workability despite the increased size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Volume of moving object

If the width of the outboard motor is reduced to miniaturize, then the size is improved, but the position for mounting the oil filter becomes constrained

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovewidthVSAvoidmounting position flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes the width direction (lateral dimension) for the reinforcing ribs and oil filter mounting structure. By extending elements in the width direction rather than increasing overall motor width, the design creates mounting space for the oil filter within the constrained lateral dimension, achieving miniaturization while maintaining mounting flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10800501B2Outboard motor
Publication Date: 2020.10.13 SUZUKI MOTOR CORP
  • US10800501B2 patent drawing
  • US10800501B2 patent drawing
  • US10800501B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided an outboard motor. In a posture in use of the outboard motor, an oil filter is inclined such that a mounting portion side is located lower than a tip end side and the mounting portion side is located at an inner side and a tip end side is located at an outer side in the width direction of the outboard motor, a cover mating position between an upper engine cover and a lower engine cover is set to a position lower than an upper part of the tip end, and is higher than a lower part of the mounting portion, and an electric actuator is mounted on a lower part of an engine block and is mounted on a position closer to a center of the engine relative to a position of an outermost end of the oil filter in a width direction of the engine.