Outbound Order Scheduling for Consistent Store Delivery Volumes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current delivery scheduling systems face challenges in managing the variability of goods volume and delivery schedules, leading to unpredictable delivery volumes and labor planning difficulties for stores.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for optimizing delivery schedules by analyzing distribution center and store constraints to generate a target delivery schedule, incorporating network constraints and ensuring consistent delivery volumes, using processors and non-transitory computer-readable storage devices to allocate resources efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If delivery schedules are optimized to reduce variability, then delivery consistency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the delivery optimization problem into distinct modules: constraint analysis module that processes distribution center and store constraints separately, scheduling module that generates delivery schedules, and validation module that ensures schedule feasibility. This modular segmentation reduces overall system complexity while achieving reliable consistent deliveries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of distribution center and store constraints before generating delivery schedules. By pre-processing constraint information and preparing feasible schedule templates in advance, the system reduces complexity during actual schedule generation while maintaining high delivery consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If detailed constraint analysis is performed for each distribution center and store, then delivery schedule accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveschedule accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by analyzing constraints specific to each distribution center and store individually rather than using a uniform approach. Each location's unique constraints (capacity, labor availability, delivery windows) are processed with appropriate detail level, achieving high schedule accuracy without uniformly increasing processing time across all locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts analysis parameters based on the specific context of each distribution center and store. For example, it varies the depth of constraint analysis, the granularity of time windows considered, and the level of detail in resource allocation based on location-specific characteristics, thereby achieving accurate schedules with optimized processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If delivery volumes are standardized to facilitate labor planning, then operational efficiency is improved, but flexibility in responding to demand changes decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoiddemand responsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic delivery scheduling that adapts to changing demand conditions. While it establishes standardized delivery volumes and patterns to improve operational efficiency and labor planning, the system continuously monitors demand signals and can dynamically adjust schedules in response to actual demand changes, thereby maintaining both efficiency and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor actual delivery performance and demand conditions. This feedback enables the system to learn from past performance and adjust future schedules, balancing standardized patterns for operational efficiency with the flexibility needed to respond to demand changes. The feedback loop ensures that standardization does not permanently reduce adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250245605A1Systems and methods for outbound order optimization for determining a target delivery
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US20250245605A1 patent drawing
  • US20250245605A1 patent drawing
  • US20250245605A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods including one or more processors and one or more non-transitory storage devices storing computing instructions configured to run on the one or more processors and perform: receiving input information corresponding to allocating one or more containers for delivery from a distribution center to a store during a first time period, the one or more containers including one or more products; processing the input information to determine distribution center constraint information and store constraint information; generating a delivery schedule for the one or more containers from the distribution center to the store over one or more periods of time based on the distribution center constraint information and the store constraint information, wherein each of the one or more periods of time correspond to a day; validating the delivery schedule to determine a target delivery schedule for the one or more containers from the distribution center to the store during the one or more periods of time; and transmitting the target delivery schedule to the distribution center to enable the distribution center to allocate resources to perform the target delivery schedule. Other embodiments are disclosed herein.