Outcome-Based Medical Referral System with Risk-Adjusted Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current healthcare provider search services lack access to reliable and accurate quality data, failing to facilitate informed purchasing decisions based on clinically relevant outcome measures and risk-adjusted comparisons, leading to suboptimal healthcare quality and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that collects and disseminates accurate healthcare outcome data by linking user health status questions to a clinically useful outcomes database, using algorithms to provide tailored provider recommendations, integrating risk-adjustment procedures, and ensuring data accuracy and security through Hippocratic principles and fraud protection measures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If conventional find a doctor services are used, then provider listings are made accessible, but quality data is not available for informed decision-making

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality dataVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the healthcare provider search function into distinct components: outcome data collection, risk-adjustment processing, and referral generation. Each component handles a specific aspect of the problem, allowing comprehensive quality information to be provided without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary system that collects outcome data from multiple sources, applies risk-adjustment algorithms, and presents processed quality information to consumers. This intermediary layer transforms raw data into actionable insights without requiring consumers to directly manage the complexity of data collection and analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If referrals are based on personal connections and prestige, then provider selection is simplified, but quality accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprovider selection easeVSAvoidquality measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where patient outcomes are continuously collected and used to update provider quality ratings. This creates an evidence-based referral system that maintains ease of use through automated rankings while improving measurement accuracy through continuous outcome data collection and risk-adjustment analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If outcome data is collected and disseminated, then informed purchasing decisions are enabled, but data accuracy and reliability challenges arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality data reliabilityVSAvoiddata collection and validation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary risk-adjustment processing and data validation before outcomes are disseminated. By pre-processing the data through standardized algorithms and validation protocols, the system ensures reliability while managing complexity through automated procedures rather than manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies risk-adjustment parameters to normalize outcome data across different providers and patient populations. By changing the parameters through which outcomes are measured and compared, the system accounts for varying case mix and patient characteristics, thereby improving reliability without requiring complex manual adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If comprehensive outcome data is made accessible, then healthcare quality improves, but data security and fraud protection requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehealthcare qualityVSAvoiddata security risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements preliminary anti-actions by incorporating fraud detection algorithms and security protocols before data is collected and processed. These preventive measures address security risks upfront rather than reacting to breaches, allowing comprehensive outcome data to be accessed while maintaining protection against fraud and unauthorized access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS7873525B1Method and system for outcome based medical referrals
Publication Date: 2011.01.18 KRAUS DAVID RAY
  • US7873525B1 patent drawing
  • US7873525B1 patent drawing
  • US7873525B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system is described to provide outcome data to the healthcare industry allowing for fair and accurate quality based purchasing decisions. The system deploys methods to facilitate the accurate and unbiased collection of patient outcome data. From this data warehouse of outcome data, purchasers can access aggregate outcome data identifying those providers or health plans that have achieved the best outcomes for specific criteria. Similarly, individual patient referrals can be made to providers with the best track record of helping comparable patients. Based upon outcome assessment data these searches can automatically be made based on specific patient characteristics and needs.