Two-Row Outdoor Heat Exchanger for Reversible Refrigerant Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional heat exchangers with a two-row structure face challenges in maintaining suitable refrigerant flow rates and functionality as both evaporators and condensers, particularly in air conditioning systems.

Innovation Solution

The heat exchanger design incorporates a two-row structure with windward and leeward flat tubes, including a distributor that distributes refrigerant flow effectively across multiple branches, allowing for efficient operation as both an evaporator and condenser by optimizing refrigerant flow paths and using a plate laminate configuration to enhance heat exchange and reduce pressure loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a conventional two-row heat exchanger structure is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the refrigerant flow rate decreases and heat exchange performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefrigerant flow rateVSAvoidheat exchanger structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger is divided into multiple independent tube rows (first row with first and second flat tubes, second row with third and fourth flat tubes), each capable of handling refrigerant flow separately. This segmentation allows the refrigerant to flow through multiple parallel paths, increasing the overall refrigerant flow rate while maintaining a relatively simple structure in each individual row.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extends the conventional two-row structure into a multi-row three-dimensional configuration by adding more tube rows in the refrigerant flow direction. This dimensional expansion creates additional flow paths without significantly increasing the footprint area, thereby improving refrigerant flow rate while controlling structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the heat exchanger is designed for single function (evaporator or condenser), then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to different operating modes decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedual function capabilityVSAvoidflow path configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger is designed with symmetric flow path configuration that allows it to function as both evaporator and condenser. The same physical structure and tube arrangement can handle refrigerant flow in either direction, enabling the device to perform multiple functions without requiring separate dedicated structures for each mode, thus achieving universality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs reversible flow path design where the refrigerant can flow through the tubes in opposite directions depending on whether the heat exchanger is operating as an evaporator or condenser. This inversion capability allows the same structure to serve dual purposes by simply reversing the flow direction, reducing the need for mode-specific configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Productivity

If refrigerant flow rate is increased, then heat exchange performance is improved, but pressure loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchange performanceVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the refrigerant flow into multiple parallel tube rows, the flow rate per individual tube is reduced while the total heat exchange capacity increases. This segmentation allows higher overall productivity without excessive pressure loss in any single flow path, as the pressure drop is distributed across multiple parallel channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design maintains refrigerant in a gas-liquid two-phase state for efficient heat exchange without lowering flow rates as an evaporator and effectively defrosts frost on the windward side as a condenser, improving overall heat exchange performance and reducing frost clogging.

Implementation Method 1

maintains refrigerant in a gas-liquid two-phase state for efficient heat exchange

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTwo-phase flow: Two-Phase Flow

Implementation Method 2

a heat exchanger that exchanges heat between refrigerant and air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

using a plate laminate configuration to enhance heat exchange and reduce pressure loss

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure drop reduction: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentUS20240093945A1Heat exchanger and air conditioner
Publication Date: 2024.03.21 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US20240093945A1 patent drawing
  • US20240093945A1 patent drawing
  • US20240093945A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An outdoor heat exchanger includes: a group of windward flat tubes, a group of leeward flat tubes and a distributor. When the outdoor heat exchanger acts as an evaporator, the refrigerant flows through the plurality of second flat tubes, the plurality of fourth flat tubes, the plurality of third flat tubes, and the plurality of first flat tubes in this order, and when the outdoor heat exchanger acts as a condenser, the refrigerant flows through the plurality of first flat tubes, the plurality of third flat tubes, the plurality of fourth flat tubes, and the plurality of second flat tubes in this order.