Outdoor Tabletop Frame Structure to Prevent Warping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Outdoor tabletops made of plastic or composite materials face issues with warping and bending due to temperature changes, leading to loose decorative stone components and structural instability, especially in larger sizes.

Innovation Solution

A tabletop system featuring a decorative top layer with a horizontal mesh sublayer and binder system, combined with a rigid frame system using C-channels and retaining tabs, to provide enhanced adhesion and structural integrity, using binders like unsaturated polyester resin or epoxy resin to fill gaps and adhere the stone and metal components securely.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If plastic materials are used for outdoor tabletops, then weight is reduced and resistance to harsh environmental conditions is improved, but sufficient supporting strength and rigidity cannot be achieved without additional structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetabletop weightVSAvoidsupporting strength and rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite structure combining plastic tabletop material with a metal frame (aluminum, steel, or iron) to achieve both light weight and sufficient strength. The metal frame provides the structural support while the plastic top maintains environmental resistance and portability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The tabletop is divided into separate components: a plastic top layer and a metal frame structure. This segmentation allows each material to perform its optimal function - plastic for weather resistance and the metal frame for structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If metal base plates are used to provide sufficient strength, then warping and bending are prevented, but the tabletop becomes too heavy for portable tables

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-warping strengthVSAvoidtabletop weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a solid metal base plate, the patent employs a metal frame structure with vertical and transverse members that provide the necessary anti-warping strength with significantly reduced weight compared to a solid plate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses thin metal frame members (vertical and transverse) that provide structural support through their geometry and arrangement rather than through mass, achieving strength with minimal weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Shape

If cement board with magnesium silicate plate is used as base plate, then the tabletop remains reasonably flat for smaller sizes, but the table warps in extreme temperatures when used in larger tables

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflatnessVSAvoidtemperature stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters by using metal frame members with specific thermal expansion properties that are more suitable for large tables in extreme temperatures compared to cement board with resin binders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The metal frame structure uses materials (aluminum, steel, iron) that maintain dimensional stability and resist warping in extreme temperatures better than cement board with organic resin binders, especially for large table sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If metal plate is used to provide strength and resist bending, then structural integrity is improved, but significant weight is added and adhesion with resin is poor causing separation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebending resistanceVSAvoidtabletop weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a single large metal plate, the patent segments the metal support into vertical members and transverse members that work together to provide bending resistance with reduced total weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses thin metal frame members that provide structural support through their arrangement and geometry rather than through material mass, achieving strength with minimal weight addition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

5Ease of manufacture

If polyester resin is used as binder, then cost is reduced, but the binder expands and contracts significantly with temperature changes causing warping and cracking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoiddimensional stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the binder material parameters by using epoxy resin or vinyl ester resin instead of polyester resin, achieving better dimensional stability and reduced thermal expansion/contraction while maintaining cost-effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent selects resin materials with phase transition characteristics (thermal expansion coefficients) that better match the metal frame and decorative elements, reducing differential expansion and preventing warping and cracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively prevents warping and cracking, ensuring the decorative stone components remain securely attached and the tabletop maintains structural integrity across temperature variations, even in larger sizes.

Implementation Method 1

A first horizontal sublayer of binder is disposed under and in contact with the first horizontal mesh sublayer... a second horizontal sublayer of binder may be disposed under and in contact with the horizontal felt sublayer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

The tabletop made of such material remains reasonably flat, but only for smaller size tables... If the base plate, being adhered to the resin, is flexible, then it will tend to bend with resin and warp the table. This is because the resin included as a binder or media to adhere the support plate to a decorative stone layer can expand when the temperature increases and contract when the temperature drops.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentUS9095208B1Tabletop system
Publication Date: 2015.08.04 AGIO INT
  • US9095208B1 patent drawing
  • US9095208B1 patent drawing
  • US9095208B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A tabletop system having a metal frame with at least one horizontally oriented transverse member and a rim member defining a general shape of a tabletop. At least one fiber mesh layer, fabric felt and at least one layer of adhesive binder is affixed to the underside of spaced apart decorative elements. Vertical rim elements envelope the perimeter providing the outer surface of the tabletop. The metal frame has at least one C-channel with retention tabs defining an opening into a base cavity. The base cavity and opening are filled with adhesive binder material and cured before placing the frame assembly into the binder layer of the decorative elements where the rim of the frame member is smaller than the perimeter of the vertical element which is then interposed with a mesh strip and binder. The retention tabs mechanically secure the tabletop to the frame system.