Outer Guide Vane Profile for Unducted Rotor Flow Straightening
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing unducted turbine engines face issues with decreased aerodynamic performance, increased noise levels, and mechanical stresses at the blade tip due to the low solidity of outer guide vanes, which are exacerbated by loading the propeller at the blade head.
Innovation Solution
An outer guide vane design with a specific deviation profile ranging from 20° to 45° at the radially inner boundary and 10° to 40° at the tip, along with a decreasing and increasing deviation pattern across the blade height, to improve airflow straightening and reduce mechanical stresses.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Power
If the propeller is loaded at the blade head to maximize work and increase flow deviation, then the driving thrust is improved, but the outer guide vane must make a strong deviation to re-axialize the air flow, which increases mechanical stresses and reduces aerodynamic performance
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies different deviation angles to different sections of the outer guide vane blade. The radially inner boundary has a higher deviation angle (20°-45°) to effectively straighten the flow, while the blade tip has a lower deviation angle (10°-40°) to reduce mechanical stresses. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by optimizing each section for its specific function.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the deviation parameter along the blade height, creating a gradient from higher deviation at the root to lower deviation at the tip. This parameter variation allows the vane to achieve both effective flow straightening and reduced mechanical stresses simultaneously.
2Power
If the propeller is loaded at the blade head to increase flow deviation, then the driving thrust is improved, but the solidity of the outer guide vane at the blade tip is reduced, which decreases aerodynamic performance and increases noise level
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies different deviation angles to different sections of the outer guide vane blade. The radially inner boundary has a higher deviation angle (20°-45°) to effectively straighten the flow, while the blade tip has a lower deviation angle (10°-40°) to reduce mechanical stresses. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by optimizing each section for its specific function.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the deviation parameter along the blade height, creating a gradient from higher deviation at the root to lower deviation at the tip. This parameter variation allows the vane to achieve both effective flow straightening and reduced mechanical stresses simultaneously.
3Power
If the propeller is loaded at the blade head to increase flow deviation, then the driving thrust is improved, but the lower solidity of the outer guide vane at the blade tip reduces its ability to straighten the flow, which decreases aerodynamic performance
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies different deviation angles to different sections of the outer guide vane blade. The radially inner boundary has a higher deviation angle (20°-45°) to effectively straighten the flow, while the blade tip has a lower deviation angle (10°-40°) to reduce mechanical stresses. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by optimizing each section for its specific function.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the deviation parameter along the blade height, creating a gradient from higher deviation at the root to lower deviation at the tip. This parameter variation allows the vane to achieve both effective flow straightening and reduced mechanical stresses simultaneously.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
Enhances aerodynamic performance and reduces noise generation while minimizing mechanical stresses at the blade tip, thereby optimizing the thrust-generating assembly's efficiency.
Implementation Method 1
a deviation (δ) of the profile, corresponding to an absolute value of a difference between a tangent to the skeleton at the leading edge and a tangent to the skeleton at the trailing edge of the blade
Data Source
AI summary
The present invention relates to a flow-straightening stator (5) of an unducted thrust-generating assembly (3) comprising a plurality of blades (7) each having: —a tip (11) and a radially inner boundary (10) corresponding to an intersection between the blade (7) and a casing (8) of the turbine engine (1); —a skeleton (16); and—a deviation (S) of the profile, corresponding to an absolute value of a difference between a tangent to the skeleton (16) at the leading edge (14) and a tangent to the skeleton (16) at the trailing edge (15) of the blade (7), of between 20° and 450 at the radially inner boundary (10) of the blade (7) and between 10° and 40° at the tip (11) of the blade (7).


